0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Remediation Sign in to save

A Synthesis of Marine Monitoring Methods With the Potential to Enhance the Status Assessment of the Baltic Sea

Frontiers in Marine Science 2020 30 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 35 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Robin Lenz, Outi Setälä, Outi Setälä, Robin Lenz, Maiju Lehtiniemi, Robin Lenz, Robin Lenz, Maiju Lehtiniemi, Robin Lenz, Outi Setälä, Outi Setälä, Outi Setälä, Robin Lenz, Robin Lenz, Outi Setälä, Outi Setälä, Outi Setälä, Robin Lenz, Jennifer S. Strehse, Robin Lenz, Robin Lenz, Ángel Borja, Ángel Borja, Ángel Borja, Robin Lenz, Ángel Borja, Ángel Borja, Leoni Mack, Robin Lenz, Robin Lenz, Outi Setälä, Antonia Liess, Jenni Attila, Outi Setälä, Robin Lenz, Robin Lenz, Robin Lenz, Robin Lenz, Robin Lenz, Ángel Borja, Robin Lenz, Outi Setälä, Outi Setälä, Outi Setälä, Maiju Lehtiniemi, Maiju Lehtiniemi, Maiju Lehtiniemi, Outi Setälä, Outi Setälä, Maiju Lehtiniemi, Maiju Lehtiniemi, Robin Lenz, Outi Setälä, Outi Setälä, Robin Lenz, Outi Setälä, Urmas Lips, Urmas Lips, Antonia Liess, Eva Aylagas, Eva Aylagas, Jennifer S. Strehse, Jennifer S. Strehse, Outi Setälä, Outi Setälä, Outi Setälä, Outi Setälä, Outi Setälä, Outi Setälä, Outi Setälä, Outi Setälä, Maiju Lehtiniemi, Maiju Lehtiniemi, Maiju Lehtiniemi, Maiju Lehtiniemi, Maiju Lehtiniemi, Maiju Lehtiniemi, Maiju Lehtiniemi, Maiju Lehtiniemi, Urmas Lips, Outi Setälä, Outi Setälä, Outi Setälä, Ángel Borja, Maiju Lehtiniemi, Outi Setälä, Maiju Lehtiniemi, Maiju Lehtiniemi, Maiju Lehtiniemi, Arne J. Beermann, Maiju Lehtiniemi, Maiju Lehtiniemi, Maiju Lehtiniemi, Maiju Lehtiniemi, Ángel Borja, Maiju Lehtiniemi, Maiju Lehtiniemi, Outi Setälä, Maiju Lehtiniemi, Maiju Lehtiniemi, Ángel Borja, Robin Lenz, Urmas Lips, Urmas Lips, Urmas Lips, Florian Leese, Outi Setälä, Outi Setälä, Outi Setälä, Jennifer S. Strehse, Eva Aylagas, Daniel Hering, Urmas Lips, Urmas Lips, Maiju Lehtiniemi, Maiju Lehtiniemi, Maiju Lehtiniemi, Maiju Lehtiniemi, Maria Kahlert, Robin Lenz, Florian Leese, Daniel Hering, Robin Lenz, Maiju Lehtiniemi, Outi Setälä, Antonia Liess, Maiju Lehtiniemi, Urmas Lips, Olli-Pekka Mattila, Kristian Meissner, Timo Pyhälahti, Timo Pyhälahti, Urmas Lips, Urmas Lips, Outi Setälä, Jennifer S. Strehse, Laura Uusitalo Laura Uusitalo Anna Willstrand Wranne, Anna Willstrand Wranne, Sebastian Birk, Laura Uusitalo

Summary

This review synthesized monitoring methods applicable to the Baltic Sea to improve assessment of ecosystem health, covering chemical, biological, and emerging pollutant indicators including microplastics. Better and more coordinated monitoring is essential for tracking the effectiveness of conservation measures across this heavily polluted regional sea.

Study Type Environmental

A multitude of anthropogenic pressures deteriorate the Baltic Sea, resulting in the need to protect and restore its marine ecosystem. For an efficient conservation, comprehensive monitoring and assessment of all ecosystem elements is of fundamental importance. The Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission HELCOM coordinates conservation measures regulated by several European directives. However, this holistic assessment is hindered by gaps within the current monitoring schemes. Here, twenty-two novel methods with the potential to fill some of these gaps and improve the monitoring of the Baltic marine environment are examined. We asked key stakeholders to point out methods likely to improve current Baltic Sea monitoring. We then described these methods in a comparable way and evaluated them based on their costs and applicability potential (i.e. possibility to make them operational). Twelve methods require low to very low costs, while five require moderate and two high costs. Seventeen methods were rated with a high to very high applicability, whereas four methods had moderate and one low applicability for Baltic Sea monitoring. Methods with both low costs and a high applicability include the Manta Trawl, Encapsulated Filtration Device, Sediment Corer, Argo Float, Artificial Substrates, Citizen Observation, Earth Observation, the HydroFIA®pH system, DNA Metabarcoding and Stable Isotope Analysis.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper