0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Ecological risk assessment of microplastics in coastal, shelf, and deep sea waters with a consideration of environmentally relevant size and shape

Environmental Pollution 2020 205 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 55 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Young Kyoung Song, Youna Cho, Youna Cho, Youna Cho, Youna Cho, Soeun Eo, Youna Cho, Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Jinsoo Choi, Jae‐Woong Jung, Jae‐Woong Jung, Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Sang Hee Hong, Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Sang Hee Hong, Young Kyoung Song, Won Joon Shim Won Joon Shim Won Joon Shim Won Joon Shim Won Joon Shim June‐Woo Park, Won Joon Shim June‐Woo Park, Soeun Eo, Soeun Eo, Soeun Eo, Soeun Eo, Soeun Eo, Soeun Eo, Youna Cho, Youna Cho, Sang Hee Hong, Won Joon Shim Won Joon Shim Won Joon Shim June‐Woo Park, Won Joon Shim June‐Woo Park, Sang Hee Hong, Won Joon Shim Soeun Eo, Sang Hee Hong, Sang Hee Hong, Soeun Eo, Sang Hee Hong, Sang Hee Hong, Sang Hee Hong, Won Joon Shim Sang Hee Hong, Sang Hee Hong, Sang Hee Hong, Sang Hee Hong, Sang Hee Hong, Sang Hee Hong, Sang Hee Hong, Won Joon Shim Won Joon Shim Won Joon Shim Won Joon Shim Won Joon Shim Won Joon Shim Won Joon Shim Sang Hee Hong, Youna Cho, Sang Hee Hong, Sang Hee Hong, Sang Hee Hong, Sang Hee Hong, Sang Hee Hong, Won Joon Shim Won Joon Shim Sang Hee Hong, Young Kyoung Song, Won Joon Shim Sang Hee Hong, Sang Hee Hong, Sang Hee Hong, Sang Hee Hong, Young Kyoung Song, Sang Hee Hong, Won Joon Shim Youna Cho, Sang Hee Hong, Sang Hee Hong, Sang Hee Hong, Sang Hee Hong, Sang Hee Hong, Youna Cho, Sang Hee Hong, Youna Cho, Youna Cho, Youna Cho, Youna Cho, Sang Hee Hong, Sang Hee Hong, June‐Woo Park, June‐Woo Park, June‐Woo Park, June‐Woo Park, Soeun Eo, Soeun Eo, Soeun Eo, Soeun Eo, Soeun Eo, Soeun Eo, Soeun Eo, Soeun Eo, Soeun Eo, Soeun Eo, Soeun Eo, Soeun Eo, Soeun Eo, Soeun Eo, Soeun Eo, Soeun Eo, Soeun Eo, Won Joon Shim Won Joon Shim Won Joon Shim Won Joon Shim Won Joon Shim Won Joon Shim Won Joon Shim Won Joon Shim Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, June‐Woo Park, June‐Woo Park, Won Joon Shim Won Joon Shim Youna Cho, Youna Cho, June‐Woo Park, Won Joon Shim Won Joon Shim Sang Hee Hong, Sang Hee Hong, Won Joon Shim Sang Hee Hong, Sang Hee Hong, Sang Hee Hong, Sang Hee Hong, Sang Hee Hong, Sang Hee Hong, Young Kyoung Song, Youna Cho, Sang Hee Hong, Sang Hee Hong, Sang Hee Hong, Young Kyoung Song, Sang Hee Hong, Young Kyoung Song, Sang Hee Hong, Sang Hee Hong, Sang Hee Hong, Sang Hee Hong, Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Jinsoo Choi, Young Kyoung Song, Soeun Eo, Young Kyoung Song, Sang Hee Hong, June‐Woo Park, Won Joon Shim Won Joon Shim Sang Hee Hong, June‐Woo Park, Won Joon Shim Youna Cho, Young Kyoung Song, June‐Woo Park, Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Won Joon Shim Won Joon Shim Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Sang Hee Hong, June‐Woo Park, Sang Hee Hong, Won Joon Shim June‐Woo Park, Sang Hee Hong, Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Won Joon Shim Young Kyoung Song, June‐Woo Park, June‐Woo Park, Won Joon Shim June‐Woo Park, Sang Hee Hong, Won Joon Shim Won Joon Shim Won Joon Shim Won Joon Shim June‐Woo Park, Won Joon Shim June‐Woo Park, Sang Hee Hong, Sang Hee Hong, Sang Hee Hong, Won Joon Shim Sang Hee Hong, Won Joon Shim Won Joon Shim Won Joon Shim Sang Hee Hong, June‐Woo Park, Sang Hee Hong, Sang Hee Hong, Won Joon Shim Sang Hee Hong, Won Joon Shim Youna Cho, Sang Hee Hong, Won Joon Shim Won Joon Shim Sang Hee Hong, Won Joon Shim Won Joon Shim Sang Hee Hong, Sang Hee Hong, Won Joon Shim Sang Hee Hong, Sang Hee Hong, Won Joon Shim Sang Hee Hong, June‐Woo Park, Sang Hee Hong, Sang Hee Hong, Youna Cho, Youna Cho, Won Joon Shim Won Joon Shim Won Joon Shim June‐Woo Park, Won Joon Shim Won Joon Shim Won Joon Shim Won Joon Shim Young Kyoung Song, Young Kyoung Song, Won Joon Shim

Summary

Researchers assessed the ecological risk of microplastics in coastal, shelf, and deep-sea waters off South Korea, focusing on environmentally relevant non-spherical particles in the 20-300 micrometer size range. They found that risk levels varied significantly across locations, with some coastal areas showing moderate to high ecological risk. The study emphasizes that risk assessments should account for the actual shapes and sizes of microplastics found in the environment rather than relying on idealized laboratory particles.

This study assessed the ecological risk posed by microplastics in surface and subsurface seawaters in coastal, continental shelf, and deep-sea areas of South Korea. The target microplastics for risk assessment were specified as only non-spherical type microplastics in the size range 20-300 μm, because this type was predominantly observed in our study areas, and adverse biological effects have previously been reported. Exposure data for non-spherical microplastics were obtained from a previous study or were measured for microplastics of sizes down to 20 μm. A predicted no-effect concentration (PNEC) of 12 particles/L was derived by employing a species sensitivity distribution approach. Then the results were compared to the in situ observed concentrations at each site. The detected microplastic concentrations did not exceed the derived PNEC, i.e., the current pollution levels of fragment and fiber microplastics in the size range 20-300 μm would not pose a significant threat to the marine ecosystem in South Korea. However, predictions are that microplastic pollution will increase to 50-fold by 2100 at the current rates, and in this scenario, the microplastic concentration is expected to far exceed the derived PNEC values for marine ecosystems. It is therefore urgent to take precautionary actions to prevent a further increase in microplastic concentrations in these environments.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper