0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Remediation Sign in to save

Evaluation of polypropylene degradation with commercial additives in different media of exposure

Revista Eletrônica em Gestão Educação e Tecnologia Ambiental 2020 1 citation ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 30 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Jéssica Pereira Pires, Alessandro da Silva Ramos, Gabriela Messias Miranda, Rosane Angélica Ligabue, Jeane Estela Ayres de Lima, Rogério Lourega

Summary

This study tested whether commercial pro-degradant additives can speed up polypropylene breakdown in natural water environments. Results suggest that while some additives promote early degradation, their effectiveness in realistic aquatic conditions is limited, meaning microplastic-generating fragmentation may be incomplete.

Polymers

Polypropylene (PP) is one of the most widely used polymers in the world, mainly due to its versatility, good properties, and low cost. However, since it is not easily degraded in the natural environment, several research projects have been developed to increase its biodegradability. The use of pro-degrading additives has been explored, as they promote the process of polymer degradation. Nevertheless, few studies have evaluated the degradation of these materials in natural aqueous environments such as rivers and lakes, which contain large amounts of PP waste. The goal of this study was to evaluate the degradation of polypropylene, as well as the biodegradation of PP through the incorporation of two additives of different natures, organic and enzymatic. For this purpose, PP blends were produced with 4% additive, which has the purpose of conferring biodegradability to the material, since polypropylene has high resistance to degradation. In order to verify the behavior of the materials against degradation tests with 2 different media (saline and fresh water) for a period of 6 months, the samples were characterized by Fourier Transformed Infrared Spectroscopy and Field emission scanning electron microscopy. The characterizations were carried out in order to verify the changes in the structural characteristics and in the morphology of the materials caused by the incorporation of the additive and by the exposure to the degradation media. From the results obtained, it was observed that the additives influenced the degradation of PP. In addition, the enzyme additive and the saline media caused more significant changes in the properties analyzed, indicating greater influence on the degradation process. It was concluded that the incorporation of commercial additives gives biodegradable properties to PP. Therefore, this study has an important role in the research and development of biodegradable materials in order to minimize the effects caused by plastic waste in the environment. Thus, the studied materials are an alternative in the field of plastic packaging, reducing the effects caused by plastic waste in the environment.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Plastic additives alter the influence of photodegradation on biodegradation of polyethylene/polypropylene polymers in natural rivers

Researchers investigated how common plastic additives influence the sequential photo- and biodegradation of polyethylene and polypropylene microplastics in river environments. They found that different additives had varying effects on how the plastics broke down, with some additives promoting photodegradation while hindering subsequent biodegradation. The study highlights that the chemical composition of plastic additives plays an important role in determining how microplastics persist and degrade in natural waterways.

Article Tier 2

Photo aging and fragmentation of polypropylene food packaging materials in artificial seawater

Photo-aging and fragmentation of two common polypropylene (PP) food packaging materials with different additive contents were studied under artificial accelerated weathering. Additive composition significantly influenced the rate of photochemical aging and fragmentation into microplastic particles, with implications for how packaging design affects microplastic generation in the marine environment.

Article Tier 2

Degradation of polyethylene microplastics in seawater: Insights into the environmental degradation of polymers

Researchers studied how polyethylene microplastics degrade in artificial seawater and found that exposure led to surface oxidation, cracking, and fragmentation over time. The study suggests that environmental degradation of microplastics in marine settings may generate progressively smaller particles, including nanoplastics, while also releasing chemical additives into surrounding waters.

Article Tier 2

Fragmentation of nano- and microplastics from virgin- and additive-containing polypropylene by accelerated photooxidation

Researchers measured how quickly polypropylene plastic breaks down into micro and nanoplastics under simulated sunlight over a period equivalent to about 2.7 years outdoors. They found that additives in plastic initially slow fragmentation but that mechanical stress plays a major role in producing microplastics. The study provides valuable data on how everyday plastics generate huge numbers of tiny particles as they weather in the environment.

Review Tier 2

The performance and environmental impact of pro-oxidant additive containing plastics in the open unmanaged environment—a review of the evidence

Researchers reviewed the evidence on plastics containing pro-oxidant additives, marketed as biodegradable alternatives that break down through oxidation in the natural environment. They found that while these plastics may fragment under hot, dry conditions, there is limited evidence that they fully biodegrade in cooler or wetter climates, and they may simply produce microplastic fragments faster. The study raises concerns that these products could worsen rather than solve microplastic pollution.

Share this paper