0
Article Tier 2 Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Remediation Sign in to save

Fish Don't Litter in Your House: Is International Law the Solution to the Plastic Pollution Problem?

Pace international law review 2020 3 citations

AI summary Read the abstract

This legal analysis examines whether existing international law is adequate to address ocean plastic pollution, critiquing current binding and non-binding environmental agreements and proposing improvements. Stronger international legal frameworks are seen as essential for reducing the global plastic waste that breaks down into microplastics in the world's oceans.

Study Type Environmental

This article addresses the complex issue of plastic pollution—focusing on ocean plastics. Specifically, this article examines the ocean plastics problem, critiques current binding and non-binding international environmental law surrounding ocean plastics, hazardous wastes, and pollution, and proposes a more effective solution to the ocean plastics problem. Section I provides a basic history of the creation of plastics and discusses plastics as they are used today. Section II considers the concerns surrounding ocean plastics, focusing on impacts of plastic on marine ecosystems as well as human health effects. Section III, IV, and V discuss the ongoing attempts to address the ocean plastics problem. Sections III and IV provide a brief overview of individualized and domestic attempts at addressing the ocean plastics problem, while Section V discusses attempts at addressing the problem at a global level. Section V specifically discusses the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, the Basel Convention, and the United Nations resolutions on marine plastics and microplastics in marine environments. Section VI proposes a solution to the issue of ocean plastics: a binding international treaty requiring all parties to take measures to address the ocean plastics problem by mandating the phasing out of all plastics with timetables for compliance; mandating consumption habits; directing countries to focus on alternative renewable resources; and requiring countries to repurpose recycling facilities. Section VI also proposes the treaty include: a clean-up fund; incentives for countries who ratify the treaty, in accordance with the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade; the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities; the precautionary principle; and strict enforcement mechanisms for noncompliance. Finally, Section VII summarizes the main points of this article regarding the necessity of a plastics treaty.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

International Legal Systems in Tackling the Marine Plastic Pollution: A Critical Analysis of UNCLOS and MARPOL

AI summary Read the abstract

This legal analysis examines how two major international agreements, UNCLOS and MARPOL, address marine plastic pollution and identifies significant gaps in their ability to reduce it. The existing laws lack enforceable requirements for reducing land-based plastic waste and have uneven enforcement of rules for ship-based discharges. The paper proposes strengthening international law to promote a circular economy approach, which matters because marine plastic breaks down into microplastics that enter the seafood supply.

Article Tier 2

Mechanisms for Combating Marine Plastic Pollution in International Marine Law

AI summary Read the abstract

This paper reviews the international laws meant to stop plastic pollution in our oceans and finds they're not strong enough to actually solve the problem. That matters for your health because ocean plastic breaks down into microplastics that end up in seafood, drinking water, and even our bodies—and the researchers argue we need a stronger, legally binding global treaty to fix the gaps that let this pollution continue unchecked.

Article Tier 2

An International Legal Framework for Marine Plastics Pollution

AI summary Read the abstract

This legal analysis reviews the current international framework for regulating marine plastics and identifies significant gaps and inconsistencies across treaties and agreements. The chapter argues that stronger, more unified global legal instruments are needed to effectively reduce plastic pollution in the world's oceans.

Article Tier 2

Toward a sustainable international legal framework for protecting the marine environment from plastic waste pollution

AI summary Read the abstract

This review finds that current international laws protecting oceans from plastic pollution are weak and hard to enforce, with no dedicated global treaty targeting the issue. Since ocean plastic breaks down into microplastics that enter our food and water, stronger international cooperation could mean cleaner seafood and drinking water for everyone.

Article Tier 2

Analyzing Policies to Address Marine Plastic Pollution: Filling Legal Gaps Through the Engagement of International Actors

AI summary Read the abstract

This legal analysis examines gaps in international law for addressing marine plastic pollution as a transboundary issue, reviewing relevant frameworks from UNCLOS to recent UN resolutions. The paper argues that existing international legal frameworks are insufficient and that stronger multilateral instruments specifically targeting plastic pollution are needed.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper