We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Economic valuation of benefits from the proposed REACH restriction of intentionally added microplastics
Summary
This economic study estimated how much people are willing to pay for policies that restrict intentionally added microplastics in consumer products like cosmetics. The results can help regulators justify and design cost-effective restrictions on microplastics in products where they serve no essential function.
This study elicited the willingness to pay (WTP) for measures to control the release of intentionally added microplastics. Although microplastics accumulate in the marine environment and are practically unrecoverable, there is considerable scientific uncertainty about their environmental and health effects. This study used both a Choice Experiment (CE) and Contingent Valuation (CV) to evaluate where it was more beneficial to target restrictions at source or emissions. The CE investigated source-control in evaluating how respondents accept a trade-off between the price and performance of cosmetic products when reformulated to reduce the use of microplastics. Two CV tasks then estimated the benefits of research to resolve the uncertainty, and the benefits of upgrading Wastewater Treatment Plants (WWTP) to retain more microplastics. The difference in the annual CV WTP; £53.24 for research and £73.71 respectively, suggests that respondents are willing to pay a substantial premium for the precautionary abatement of microplastics.