We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Economic valuation of benefits from the proposed REACH restriction of intentionally added microplastics
Summary
This economic study estimated how much people are willing to pay for policies that restrict intentionally added microplastics in consumer products like cosmetics. The results can help regulators justify and design cost-effective restrictions on microplastics in products where they serve no essential function.
This study elicited the willingness to pay (WTP) for measures to control the release of intentionally added microplastics. Although microplastics accumulate in the marine environment and are practically unrecoverable, there is considerable scientific uncertainty about their environmental and health effects. This study used both a Choice Experiment (CE) and Contingent Valuation (CV) to evaluate where it was more beneficial to target restrictions at source or emissions. The CE investigated source-control in evaluating how respondents accept a trade-off between the price and performance of cosmetic products when reformulated to reduce the use of microplastics. Two CV tasks then estimated the benefits of research to resolve the uncertainty, and the benefits of upgrading Wastewater Treatment Plants (WWTP) to retain more microplastics. The difference in the annual CV WTP; £53.24 for research and £73.71 respectively, suggests that respondents are willing to pay a substantial premium for the precautionary abatement of microplastics.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
A study on estimating economic benefits of government R&D programs for microplastic management
This Korean study used contingent valuation to estimate the economic benefits of government R&D programs for managing microplastic pollution, finding public willingness to pay for effective solutions. Quantifying the economic value of microplastic management supports investment decisions for public health and environmental programs.
Microplastics pollution: Economic loss and actions needed
This study highlights the economic costs associated with microplastic pollution and its threats to both environmental and human health. The researchers argue that governments should implement policies aligned with global resolutions to end plastic pollution, emphasizing the need for coordinated action to address the growing economic and ecological burden of microplastic contamination.
Exploring the Essential Use Concept for Primary Microplastics Regulation in the EU
Researchers explored how the "essential use" concept could be applied to regulate primary microplastics intentionally added to products in the EU. They analyzed different product categories to determine where microplastic use might be considered essential versus where viable alternatives already exist. The study provides a framework for policymakers to systematically phase out unnecessary microplastic uses while allowing them only in applications where no adequate substitutes are available.
Restricting microplastics in the European Union: Process and criteria under REACH
Researchers analyzed the European Union's regulatory process for restricting intentionally added microplastics under the REACH chemical regulation, finding that the procedure requires extensive socio-economic justification alongside environmental and health risk assessments. The study notes that the precautionary principle plays a limited role, meaning that the less data available on a microplastic's harm, the harder it is to restrict it.
Preferences for microplastic marine pollution management strategies: An analysis of barriers and enablers for more sustainable choices
This survey-based study examined Australian consumers' preferences for microplastic marine pollution management strategies, finding that cost and product trust are key barriers to adopting lower-microplastic products, and that willingness to pay for marine protection has limits.