0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Sign in to save

One hundred research questions in conservation physiology for generating actionable evidence to inform conservation policy and practice

Conservation Physiology 2021 58 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 55 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Steven J. Cooke, Steven J. Cooke, Steven L. Chown, Steven L. Chown, Steven J. Cooke, Yan Ropert‐Coudert, Steven J. Cooke, Jordanna N. Bergman, Yan Ropert‐Coudert, Steven J. Cooke, Christine L. Madliger, Heath A. MacMillan, Steven J. Cooke, Steven J. Cooke, John Beardall, Heath A. MacMillan, Rebecca L. Cramp, Gary Burness, Steven J. Cooke, Heath A. MacMillan, Steven J. Cooke, Heath A. MacMillan, Heath A. MacMillan, Heath A. MacMillan, Sharon A. Robinson John Beardall, John Beardall, Graham D. Raby, Yan Ropert‐Coudert, Heath A. MacMillan, Heath A. MacMillan, Gary Burness, Heath A. MacMillan, Heath A. MacMillan, Heath A. MacMillan, Nann A. Fangue, Sharon A. Robinson Heath A. MacMillan, Heath A. MacMillan, Thomas D. Clark, Heath A. MacMillan, Steven J. Cooke, Ben Dantzer, Erick de la Barrera, Nann A. Fangue, Craig E. Franklin, Andrea Fuller, Lucy A. Hawkes, Kevin R. Hultine, Kathleen E. Hunt, Oliver P. Love, Steven J. Cooke, Sharon A. Robinson Heath A. MacMillan, John W. Mandelman, Felix Christopher Mark, Lynn B. Martin, Amy E. M. Newman, Adrienne B. Nicotra, Graham D. Raby, Sharon A. Robinson Sharon A. Robinson Sharon A. Robinson Yan Ropert‐Coudert, Jodie L. Rummer, Frank Seebacher, Anne E. Todgham, Sharon A. Robinson Sean Tomlinson, Steven L. Chown, Felix Christopher Mark, Sharon A. Robinson

Summary

A collaborative effort identified 100 priority research questions across 10 themes in conservation physiology, including pollution, human-wildlife interactions, and climate adaptation. The study suggests that conservation physiology is well positioned to identify mechanisms behind population declines and test intervention strategies, providing actionable evidence to inform biodiversity management and policy decisions.

Abstract Environmental change and biodiversity loss are but two of the complex challenges facing conservation practitioners and policy makers. Relevant and robust scientific knowledge is critical for providing decision-makers with the actionable evidence needed to inform conservation decisions. In the Anthropocene, science that leads to meaningful improvements in biodiversity conservation, restoration and management is desperately needed. Conservation Physiology has emerged as a discipline that is well-positioned to identify the mechanisms underpinning population declines, predict responses to environmental change and test different in situ and ex situ conservation interventions for diverse taxa and ecosystems. Here we present a consensus list of 10 priority research themes. Within each theme we identify specific research questions (100 in total), answers to which will address conservation problems and should improve the management of biological resources. The themes frame a set of research questions related to the following: (i) adaptation and phenotypic plasticity; (ii) human–induced environmental change; (iii) human–wildlife interactions; (iv) invasive species; (v) methods, biomarkers and monitoring; (vi) policy, engagement and communication; (vii) pollution; (viii) restoration actions; (ix) threatened species; and (x) urban systems. The themes and questions will hopefully guide and inspire researchers while also helping to demonstrate to practitioners and policy makers the many ways in which physiology can help to support their decisions.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper