0
Article Tier 2 Marine & Wildlife Nanoplastics Sign in to save

The need to investigate continuums of plastic particle diversity, brackish environments and trophic transfer to assess the risk of micro and nanoplastics on aquatic organisms

Environmental Pollution 2021 38 citations

AI summary Read the abstract

A systematic literature review identified gaps in microplastic toxicology research, particularly the lack of studies using environmentally realistic particles in brackish-water environments and the underrepresentation of trophic transfer studies compared to single-species exposure tests.

Study Type Environmental

Plastic particles are ubiquitous in marine and freshwater environments. While many studies have focused on the toxicity of microplastics (MPs) and nanoplastics (NPs) in aquatic environments there is no clear conclusion on their environmental risk, which can be attributed to a lack of standardization of protocols for in situ sampling, laboratory experiments and analyzes. There are also far more studies concerning marine environments than fresh or brackish waters despite their role in the transfer of plastics from continents to oceansWe systematically reviewed the literature for studies: (1) using plastics representative of those found in the environment in laboratory experiments, (2) on the contamination of plastic particles in the continuum between fresh and marine waters, focusing in particular on estuaries and (3) on the continuum of contamination of plastic particles between species through trophic transfer in aquatic environments. We found that the exposure of aquatic organisms in the laboratory to plastic particles collected in the environment are very scarce. Moreover, plastic exposures of estuarine species in the laboratory are generally carried out for a single salinity and a single temperature that do not reflect the fluctuating environmental conditions of estuaries. Finally, the trophic transfer of plastic particles is mainly studied in the laboratory through simple food chains which are not representative of the complexity of the trophic networks observed in the aquatic environment. We pointed out that future studies in the laboratory should include both MPs and NPs sampled in the environment and focus on the precise characterization of the composition and surface of these plastics as well as on their absorbed pollutants, additives or biofilms. Moreover, investigations must be continued concerning the toxicity of plastic particles in brackish water environments such as estuaries and the trophic transfer of plastic particles in complex food chains.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Gaps in aquatic toxicological studies of microplastics

AI summary Read the abstract

This paper identifies key gaps in aquatic toxicological studies of microplastics, arguing that most studies use unrealistic concentrations or particle types and calling for more ecologically relevant experimental designs to better assess real-world risks.

Article Tier 2

Toxicity of microplastics and nanoplastics for aquatic organisms along the freshwater-marine water continuum.

AI summary Read the abstract

I should note upfront that the abstract provided doesn't include specific findings, just a title and generic text, so I can't accurately summarize what this paper actually discovered. Based on the title alone: this appears to be a review looking at how tiny plastic particles (microplastics and even smaller nanoplastics) harm water-dwelling organisms as they move from rivers and lakes out to the ocean. Understanding this matters because these same waterways are where much of our seafood comes from, and plastic pollution that harms fish and other aquatic life could eventually work its way into the food we eat. If you can share the actual abstract text, I'd be

Article Tier 2

Towards harmonized ecotoxicological effect assessment of micro- and nanoplastics in aquatic systems

AI summary Read the abstract

This review highlights the methodological problems in current microplastic and nanoplastic toxicity research on freshwater organisms, including the use of unrealistic plastic types, poor test designs, and environmentally irrelevant doses. The authors propose a harmonized framework for testing that better reflects real-world conditions, including more realistic particle types and exposure levels. Better standardized research is essential for accurately assessing the true environmental and health risks of micro and nanoplastic pollution.

Article Tier 2

Identifying Knowledge Gaps on Ecotoxicological Assessment of Micro/Nanoplastics with Aquatic Keystone Species

AI summary Read the abstract

This review identifies knowledge gaps in the ecotoxicological assessment of micro- and nanoplastics across aquatic and terrestrial organisms, highlighting inconsistencies in particle characterization, exposure concentrations, and endpoint selection that limit cross-study comparisons and risk assessment.

Article Tier 2

Microplastics in Aquatic Ecosystems: A Review of Ecotoxicological Effects, Exposure Pathways and Trophic Transfer Risks

AI summary Read the abstract

This review synthesises evidence on the ecotoxicological effects of microplastics in marine, freshwater, and estuarine environments, covering ingestion, bioaccumulation, trophic transfer, and physiological harms across aquatic fauna. It identifies chemical co-contamination and particle size as key modulators of toxicity.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper