0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Assessment of Subsampling Strategies in Microspectroscopy of Environmental Microplastic Samples

Frontiers in Environmental Science 2021 65 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 45 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Dieter Fischer, Kristina Enders, Kristina Enders, Kristina Enders, Kristina Enders, Kristina Enders, Matthias Labrenz Kristina Enders, Kristina Enders, Kristina Enders, Kristina Enders, Kristina Enders, Josef Brandt, Josef Brandt, Josef Brandt, Kristina Enders, Dieter Fischer, Dieter Fischer, Kristina Enders, Matthias Labrenz Kristina Enders, Kristina Enders, Kristina Enders, Kristina Enders, Kristina Enders, Kristina Enders, Kristina Enders, Kristina Enders, Kristina Enders, Kristina Enders, Kristina Enders, Matthias Labrenz Matthias Labrenz Matthias Labrenz Matthias Labrenz Matthias Labrenz Matthias Labrenz Matthias Labrenz Dieter Fischer, Franziska Fischer, Franziska Fischer, Franziska Fischer, Franziska Fischer, Dieter Fischer, Kristina Enders, Kristina Enders, Kristina Enders, Kristina Enders, Kristina Enders, Kristina Enders, Dieter Fischer, Matthias Labrenz Matthias Labrenz Matthias Labrenz Matthias Labrenz Matthias Labrenz Matthias Labrenz Matthias Labrenz Dieter Fischer, Dieter Fischer, Dieter Fischer, Dieter Fischer, Franziska Fischer, Franziska Fischer, Franziska Fischer, Franziska Fischer, Franziska Fischer, Franziska Fischer, Franziska Fischer, Franziska Fischer, Franziska Fischer, Franziska Fischer, Elisavet Kanaki, Dieter Fischer, Elisavet Kanaki, Josef Brandt, Matthias Labrenz Josef Brandt, Josef Brandt, Dieter Fischer, Dieter Fischer, Josef Brandt, Kristina Enders, Josef Brandt, Dieter Fischer, Dieter Fischer, Matthias Labrenz Matthias Labrenz Josef Brandt, Matthias Labrenz Matthias Labrenz Dieter Fischer, Dieter Fischer, Dieter Fischer, Dieter Fischer, Josef Brandt, Dieter Fischer, Franziska Fischer, Franziska Fischer, Matthias Labrenz Matthias Labrenz Matthias Labrenz Josef Brandt, Franziska Fischer, Matthias Labrenz Dieter Fischer, Kristina Enders, Matthias Labrenz Dieter Fischer, Josef Brandt, Dieter Fischer, Matthias Labrenz Matthias Labrenz Matthias Labrenz Matthias Labrenz Matthias Labrenz Matthias Labrenz Matthias Labrenz Matthias Labrenz Dieter Fischer, Dieter Fischer, Dieter Fischer, Matthias Labrenz Matthias Labrenz Matthias Labrenz Dieter Fischer, Dieter Fischer, Dieter Fischer, Dieter Fischer, Dieter Fischer, Matthias Labrenz Dieter Fischer, Dieter Fischer, Matthias Labrenz Franziska Fischer, Dieter Fischer, Dieter Fischer, Dieter Fischer, Dieter Fischer, Matthias Labrenz Matthias Labrenz Matthias Labrenz Matthias Labrenz Matthias Labrenz Dieter Fischer, Matthias Labrenz Matthias Labrenz Matthias Labrenz Franziska Fischer, Dieter Fischer, Matthias Labrenz Franziska Fischer, Matthias Labrenz Matthias Labrenz Matthias Labrenz Dieter Fischer, Matthias Labrenz Matthias Labrenz Matthias Labrenz Dieter Fischer, Matthias Labrenz Matthias Labrenz Matthias Labrenz Matthias Labrenz Matthias Labrenz

Summary

This study evaluated subsampling strategies for microspectroscopic analysis of environmental microplastic samples, finding that the choice of subsampling method significantly affects the accuracy of polymer identification and particle count estimates.

The analysis of environmental occurrence of microplastic (MP) particles has gained notable attention within the past decade. An effective risk assessment of MP litter requires elucidating sources of MP particles, their pathways of distribution and, ultimately, sinks. Therefore, sampling has to be done in high frequency, both spatially and temporally, resulting in a high number of samples to analyze. Microspectroscopy techniques, such as FTIR imaging or Raman particle measurements allow an accurate analysis of MP particles regarding their chemical classification and size. However, these methods are time-consuming, which gives motivation to establish subsampling protocols that require measuring less particles, while still obtaining reliable results. The challenge regarding the subsampling of environmental MP samples lies in the heterogeneity of MP types and the relatively low numbers of target particles. Herein, we present a comprehensive assessment of different proposed subsampling methods on a selection of real-world samples from different environmental compartments. The methods are analyzed and compared with respect to resulting MP count errors, which eventually allows giving recommendations for staying within acceptable error margins. Our results are based on measurements with Raman microspectroscopy, but are applicable to any other analysis technique. We show that the subsampling-errors are mainly due to statistical counting errors (i.e., extrapolation from low numbers) and only in edge cases additionally impacted by inhomogeneous distribution of particles on the filters. Keeping the subsampling-errors low can mainly be realized by increasing the fraction of MP particles in the samples.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper