0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Sign in to save

Barriers and Enablers to Buying Biodegradable and Compostable Plastic Packaging

Sustainability 2021 72 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 45 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Ayşe Lisa Allison, Fabiana Lorencatto, Susan Michie, Mark Miodownik

Summary

This study identified key barriers and enablers to consumer purchasing of biodegradable and compostable plastic packaging, finding that price, confusing labeling, and lack of awareness were the main barriers, while environmental concern and visible certification drove purchase intent.

Biodegradable and compostable plastic packaging (BCPP) has the potential to reduce a global plastic waste problem. We aimed to identify influences on buying BCPP as a basis for designing strategies that enable BCPP’s environmental benefits. Using a UK-focused citizen science dataset, we thematically analysed 610 survey responses to a question exploring reasons for BCPP purchase. Themes are categorised as barriers and enablers and according to the components of the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, and Behaviour (COM-B) model of behaviour. Key barriers concerned: psychological capability (not understanding terminology used to label packaging, not taking notice of packaging, and preferring other types of packaging and product qualities); reflective motivation (negative beliefs about BCPP’s environmental impacts and skepticism over decomposition claims), and physical opportunity (no access to appropriate waste management). Key enablers concern: reflective motivation (positive beliefs about BCPP’s environmental impact and resolve to behave pro-environmentally) and physical opportunity (access to appropriate waste management). Reducing ambiguity concerning the labels of biodegradable and compostable may reduce skepticism over environmental claims of packaging. Interventions should improve information about the source of the packaging material, how the packaging waste is processed, and how to dispose of the packaging. This will not be sufficient unless facilities for local BCPP waste collection and processing are increased.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Addressing Stakeholder Concerns Regarding the Effective Use of Bio-Based and Biodegradable Plastics

This study reviewed stakeholder concerns about bio-based and biodegradable plastics, finding that consumer confusion about what biodegradable means, inconsistent labeling, and lack of adequate composting infrastructure are major barriers to adoption, and that clearer standards and communication are needed to realize their environmental potential.

Article Tier 2

Examining Consumer Attention to Environmental Labels on Food Packaging

This study investigated consumer awareness and attention to environmental labels on food packaging, examining responses to degradable and recyclable eco-friendly packaging options. The research aimed to understand how label design and consumer attitudes translate into environmentally conscious purchasing decisions.

Article Tier 2

Consumer-driven evaluation of Ecoplas as a sustainable flexible packaging in Jakarta

Researchers evaluated Ecoplas starch-based biodegradable packaging against conventional polypropylene, recycled polypropylene, and oxo-biodegradable options using PROMETHEE II multi-criteria analysis based on surveys of 96 consumers in Jakarta. Conventional PP remained most preferred overall, though Ecoplas scored well on environmental preference and willingness to purchase, with accessibility and durability identified as key barriers to wider adoption.

Article Tier 2

Consumer attitudes and concerns with bioplastics use: An international study

Researchers surveyed consumers across 42 countries about their knowledge and attitudes toward bioplastics as an alternative to conventional plastics. The study found that while most consumers were concerned about plastic pollution, awareness and understanding of bioplastics varied significantly across regions. The findings suggest that clearer labeling and better public education about bioplastic options could help drive consumer adoption of more sustainable materials.

Article Tier 2

Single-use plastic packaging in the Canadian food industry: consumer behavior and perceptions

Researchers surveyed Canadian consumers about their awareness and attitudes toward single-use plastic food packaging, finding that while most were concerned about plastic waste, many reported lacking clear information about alternatives and that convenience and cost still strongly influenced purchasing decisions.

Share this paper