We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Results of WEPAL-QUASIMEME/NORMANs first global interlaboratory study on microplastics reveal urgent need for harmonization
AI summary Read the abstract
The first global interlaboratory study on microplastic determination revealed high variability in results across 34 participating laboratories, highlighting the urgent need for harmonized methods, certified reference materials, and standardized reporting to enable meaningful data comparisons.
To survey the conformity and quality of results among laboratories for microplastics determination worldwide, an international laboratory intercomparison and development exercise was organized. The 34 participants were requested to determine the polymer type and number or mass of polymer particles in 12 samples, i.e. six samples containing of pre-production pellets, five dissolvable soda tablets containing different (smaller) polymer particles and one blank soda tablet. A novel method for providing the test materials in aluminium strips was used. Thirty laboratories (88%) submitted data using their own method of choice, resulting in a variety of identification and quantification methods (n = 7). The majority of the labs (53-100%) correctly identified the type of polymer in all samples but one. The performance of the laboratories in quantifying and weighing the pellets was very good. The analysis of the number of the particles in the soda tablets varied considerably between laboratories (29-91%). The results of this study highlight the complexity of microplastics analysis and the need for harmonization of both reporting format and methods. Continued development and assessment of the comparability among analytical methods and laboratories are urgently needed to support monitoring programmes, research and decision-making.
More Papers Like This
Interlaboratory Comparison Reveals State of the Art in Microplastic Detection and Quantification Methods
AI summary Read the abstract
An 84-laboratory interlaboratory comparison tested the accuracy of five established microplastic detection methods using standardized reference materials, revealing significant variability in results across labs and methods. The study highlights that standardization and harmonization of analytical procedures are urgently needed before microplastic measurement can be reliably compared across research groups.
Interlaboratory Comparison Reveals State of the Art in Microplastic Detection and Quantification Methods
AI summary Read the abstract
This large international study compared how 84 laboratories around the world performed when identifying and measuring microplastics using five common detection methods. The results showed significant differences between labs, with spectroscopy-based methods generally outperforming heat-based techniques for accuracy. The findings highlight that standardized methods are urgently needed so that microplastic measurements in food, water, and the environment can be reliably compared across studies.
Microplastic analysis—are we measuring the same? Results on the first global comparative study for microplastic analysis in a water sample
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers conducted the first international comparative study of analytical methods for microplastic analysis in a water sample and found that comparability between methods was highly limited, underscoring the urgent need for standardized protocols in microplastic research.
Instrument-dependent variability affects both microplastic polymer identification and quantification: an inter-laboratory comparison using polymer standards
AI summary Read the abstract
Scientists testing the same plastic samples across labs in seven countries found that different machines and equipment setups gave surprisingly different results for identifying and counting microplastics—even when everyone followed the same testing steps. This matters because it means current microplastic pollution data may vary based on what equipment a lab uses rather than reflecting real differences in the environment, making it harder to know how much microplastic exposure we're actually dealing with until testing methods become more standardized.
Monitoring microplastics in drinking water: An interlaboratory study to inform effective methods for quantifying and characterizing microplastics
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers conducted an interlaboratory study with 22 labs from six countries to evaluate methods for quantifying microplastics in drinking water, finding significant variability between labs and identifying key areas for method standardization.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.