We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Mesh selectivity of neuston nets for microplastics
AI summary Read the abstract
Parallel tows with neuston nets of different mesh sizes demonstrated that larger-mesh nets significantly undercount small microplastics below 2 mm, quantifying mesh-dependent selectivity and calling for finer-mesh standardization in surface water microplastic surveys.
Two neuston nets, mesh opening 1.00 mm and 0.333 mm, were towed in parallel. The 0.333 mm net collected more microplastics of longest length ≤2.00 mm than the 1.00 mm net. Mesh selection curve of the 1.00 mm mesh net for microplastics was estimated with the SELECT analysis by comparison of size distributions of microplastics collected by the two nets. Selection curve of the 0.333 mm mesh net, often used as a standard mesh size for microplastic net sampling, was also estimated on the assumption of geometrical similarity between microplastic size and mesh opening for a given retention probability. Approximately 60% amount of microplastics (0.4-1.0 mm) in net sampling with the 0.333 mm net passed through the mesh and was thus unaccounted for. The 0.333 mm net can retain at most 1.5% of microplastics ≤0.4 mm entering the net, and rarely retained microplastics ≤0.3 mm.
More Papers Like This
Are we underestimating microplastic abundance in the marine environment? A comparison of microplastic capture with nets of different mesh-size
AI summary Read the abstract
By sampling marine water simultaneously with 333 µm and finer nets, researchers demonstrated that standard 333 µm sampling nets miss the majority of microplastics present, with finer nets capturing orders of magnitude more particles and revealing severe underestimation in existing abundance data.
Differences in microplastic distributions on the surface freshwater collected using 100– and 355–μm meshes
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers compared microplastic distributions measured using 100-micrometer and 355-micrometer mesh nets in Japanese freshwater, finding that the finer mesh captured significantly more and smaller particles. The choice of sampling mesh size substantially affects the measured abundance and size distribution of microplastics in water.
Size selection in sampling nets leads to underestimation of microplastic pollution
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers developed a new model to account for the size-dependent retention biases of sampling nets used in microplastic pollution monitoring. They found that nets with a 330-micrometer mesh underestimated microplastic fiber concentrations by approximately 45% and fragment concentrations by about 30% compared to a finer 92-micrometer mesh. The study provides a framework for correcting these biases, which could significantly improve the accuracy and comparability of microplastic pollution assessments across studies.
Sampling microfibres at the sea surface: The effects of mesh size, sample volume and water depth
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers examined how mesh size, sample volume, and water depth affect microfibre sampling at the sea surface, finding that fibre density increased substantially as mesh size decreased from 63 to 20 micrometres, highlighting significant underestimation in traditional 300-500 micrometer net surveys.
Size and shape matter: A preliminary analysis of microplastic sampling technique in seawater studies with implications for ecological risk assessment
AI summary Read the abstract
This study showed that sampling with coarse-mesh towed nets significantly underestimates microplastic concentrations in seawater, particularly for fibrous particles, raising concerns about the accuracy of published abundance estimates.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.