0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Sign in to save

Unpacking Plastic: Investigating Plastic Related Ambivalence

Sustainability 2021 26 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 40 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
L. Albert Hahn, Benjamin Buttlar, Eva Walther

Summary

Researchers investigated consumer ambivalence toward plastic-packaged food in two studies, finding that participants showed greater psychological ambivalence and rated plastic-packaged food less favorably than unpackaged alternatives, regardless of whether they received positive or negative information about plastic.

Many people are aware of the negative consequences of plastic use on the environment. Nevertheless, they use plastic due to its functionality. In the present paper, we hypothesized that this leads to the experience of ambivalence—the simultaneous existence of positive and negative evaluations of plastic. In two studies, we found that participants showed greater ambivalence toward plastic packed food than unpacked food. Moreover, they rated plastic packed food less favorably than unpacked food in response evaluations. In Study 2, we tested whether one-sided (only positive vs. only negative) information interventions could effectively influence ambivalence. Results showed that ambivalence is resistant to (social) influence. Directions for future research were discussed.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Explicitly and Implicitly Measured Valence and Risk Attitudes Towards Plastic Packaging, Plastic Waste, and Microplastic in a German Sample

This psychology study measured both explicit and implicit attitudes toward plastic packaging and microplastics in German consumers, finding that people simultaneously appreciate the convenience of plastic while expressing concern about pollution. The gap between attitudes and behavior helps explain why plastic consumption continues despite public concern about microplastics.

Article Tier 2

Single-use plastic packaging in the Canadian food industry: consumer behavior and perceptions

Researchers surveyed Canadian consumers about their awareness and attitudes toward single-use plastic food packaging, finding that while most were concerned about plastic waste, many reported lacking clear information about alternatives and that convenience and cost still strongly influenced purchasing decisions.

Article Tier 2

Plastic Food Packaging: Perceptions and Attitudes of Portuguese Consumers about Environmental Impact and Recycling

This study surveyed Portuguese consumers about plastic food packaging, finding that while most recognized environmental impacts and supported recycling, their actual behaviors often did not align with their stated environmental awareness.

Article Tier 2

Perceptions and knowledge regarding quality and safety of plastic materials used for food packaging

Researchers surveyed 487 Portuguese consumers about their perceptions of plastic food packaging safety, finding that while 81% consider food safety when purchasing, most lack detailed knowledge about the health risks of plastic additives and microplastic contamination.

Article Tier 2

Food packaging during the COVID‐19 pandemic: Consumer perceptions

Researchers surveyed Canadian consumers about their attitudes toward plastic food packaging during the COVID-19 pandemic and found a complex picture: while environmental concerns persisted, the pandemic increased perceived need for single-use plastic packaging due to hygiene concerns, temporarily reversing pre-pandemic trends toward reduction.

Share this paper