0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Nanoplastics Sign in to save

Micro and Nanoplastics Identification: Classic Methods and Innovative Detection Techniques

Frontiers in Toxicology 2021 364 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 55 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Stefania Mariano, Stefania Mariano, Stefano Tacconi, Stefania Mariano, Stefano Tacconi, Marco Fidaleo, Marco Rossi Luciana Dini, Luciana Dini, Marco Rossi Luciana Dini, Marco Rossi

Summary

This review covers both classical and innovative methods for identifying micro- and nanoplastics in environmental samples. Researchers compare techniques including FTIR and Raman spectroscopy, thermal analysis, and emerging approaches like machine learning-assisted detection. The study emphasizes the need for standardized analytical protocols to ensure reliable and comparable measurements of plastic contamination across different environmental matrices.

Micro and nanoplastics are fragments with dimensions less than a millimeter invading all terrestrial and marine environments. They have become a major global environmental issue in recent decades and, indeed, recent scientific studies have highlighted the presence of these fragments all over the world even in environments that were thought to be unspoiled. Analysis of micro/nanoplastics in isolated samples from abiotic and biotic environmental matrices has become increasingly common. Hence, the need to find valid techniques to identify these micro and nano-sized particles. In this review, we discuss the current and potential identification methods used in microplastic analyses along with their advantages and limitations. We discuss the most suitable techniques currently available, from physical to chemical ones, as well as the challenges to enhance the existing methods and develop new ones. Microscopical techniques (i.e., dissect, polarized, fluorescence, scanning electron, and atomic force microscopy) are one of the most used identification methods for micro/nanoplastics, but they have the limitation to produce incomplete results in analyses of small particles. At present, the combination with chemical analysis (i.e., spectroscopy) overcome this limit together with recently introduced alternative approaches. For example, holographic imaging in microscope configuration images microplastics directly in unfiltered water, thus discriminating microplastics from diatoms and differentiates different sizes, shapes, and plastic types. The development of new analytical instruments coupled with each other or with conventional and innovative microscopy could solve the current problems in the identification of micro/nanoplastics.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper