We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
A comparison of emerging contaminant fingerprinting techniques to assess the impact of human wastewater on karst groundwater quality
AI summary Read the abstract
This study compared different methods for detecting human wastewater contamination in vulnerable Irish groundwater aquifers, including microplastics as a potential pollution tracer. Karst aquifers are especially vulnerable because direct connections between surface and groundwater make them easy to contaminate.
Lowland karst aquifers in Ireland are extremely complex to understand and are considered to be highly vulnerable to pollution (e.g. low-lying karst catchments exhibit a lot of surface water – groundwater interactions which makes them very susceptible to direct contamination). These aquifers are impacted by multiple contamination sources on land (in particular, rural sources from agriculture and on-site domestic wastewater effluent) which makes their protection and management challenging. Human wastewater effluent is identified as significant threat to groundwater quality in such lowland Irish karst environments, since approximately one-third of the population in Ireland is relying on decentralized wastewater treatment systems for the treatment of domestic wastewater. However, it is difficult to distinguish between human wastewater effluent and agricultural pollution impacts on karst aquifers using only traditional water quality parameters or any single environmental tracing method. Hence, the impact of microbial and chemical contaminants of human wastewater origin on groundwater quality must be assessed using a multiple-tracer approach, ideally targeting source-specific tracers. This paper presents an overview of the results obtained during the research conducted throughout the last several years at nine karst catchments in Ireland using a range of methodologies in order to determine and quantify domestic wastewater pollution impacts on karst springs. Microbial pollution was assessed using flow cytometric fingerprinting and faecal indicator bacteria, while chemical pollution impact assessment included the analysis of fluorescent whitening compounds (FWCs; well-known indicators of human contamination since their origin is mostly from laundry detergents), specific anion ratio signatures (Cl/Br), quantification and identification of microplastic particles using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and faecal sterol and stanol profiles and ratios. A thorough analysis of the results obtained using a multiple-tracer approach has been conducted and methodologies have been evaluated in terms of applicability and sensitivity in a range of different karst catchments. The ability of these methodologies and techniques to determine and quantify human faecal pollution impacts on karst springs will be discussed. The results show a significant correlation between microplastic particle counts and detected FWCs signals at different springs, which helps to understand the contribution of household-derived contaminants to this environmental problem. Moreover, our results indicate that faecal sterols and stanols can be useful faecal source tracking method in karst aquifer systems despite the fact that concentrations of sterols and stanols of interest were usually low which makes the interpretation of results challenging.
More Papers Like This
Understanding the impacts of human wastewater effluent pollution on karst springs using chemical contamination fingerprinting techniques
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers used multi-tracer chemical fingerprinting to trace human wastewater contamination into karst spring systems, finding that these highly permeable aquifers rapidly transmit pollutants including pharmaceuticals and potentially microplastics from surface sources to drinking water springs.
Comparative Analysis of Microplastic Contamination in Groundwater: Alluvial vs. Karst Aquifers
The invisible problem of microplastics and microfibres in karst systems and aquifers: a multidisciplinary approach
AI summary Read the abstract
This thesis investigates how microplastics and microfibres move through karst (limestone) systems and underground aquifers using a multidisciplinary approach, a concern because karst aquifers supply drinking water to roughly a quarter of the global population and are particularly vulnerable to contamination given their direct hydraulic connections to the surface.
Ground Water
AI summary Read the abstract
Short evidence note providing the first documentation that microplastics are present in karst groundwater systems, expanding known contamination pathways beyond surface water to underground drinking water sources. The finding has implications for human exposure through groundwater-sourced drinking water.
Groundwater: An Endangered Invisible Resource. Microplastic Pollution in Underground Karst Systems, from Surface Watercourses to Cave Waters
AI summary Read the abstract
This study traced microplastic pollution through underground karst systems, from surface watercourses into cave waters and aquifers, finding that even these concealed environments are contaminated despite being a major global drinking water source. The discovery that microplastics infiltrate karst groundwater suggests that a significant fraction of the world's population consuming groundwater may face previously unrecognized microplastic ingestion exposure.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.