0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Human Health Effects Nanoplastics Sign in to save

Resolving the effects of environmental micro- and nanoplastics exposure in biota: A knowledge gap analysis

The Science of The Total Environment 2021 47 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 50 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Daniel Mark Lyons Petra Burić, Ines Kovačić, Petra Burić, Philippe J. Thomas, Philippe J. Thomas, Ines Kovačić, Giovanni Pagano, Marco Trifuoggi, Giovanni Pagano, Rahime Oral, Rahime Oral, Petra Burić, Genevieve A. Perono, Rahime Oral, Ines Kovačić, Ines Kovačić, Marco Trifuoggi, Ines Kovačić, Maria Toscanesi, Marco Trifuoggi, Giovanni Pagano, Rahime Oral, Franca Tommasi, Marco Trifuoggi, Maria Toscanesi, Marco Trifuoggi, Ines Kovačić, Marco Trifuoggi, Giovanni Pagano, Petra Burić, Daniel Mark Lyons Rahime Oral, Marco Trifuoggi, Marco Trifuoggi, Marco Trifuoggi, Maria Toscanesi, Petra Burić, Petra Burić, Petra Burić, Petra Burić, Rahime Oral, Rahime Oral, Daniel Mark Lyons Daniel Mark Lyons Giovanni Pagano, Giovanni Pagano, Petra Burić, Petra Burić, Marco Trifuoggi, Marco Trifuoggi, Ines Kovačić, Marco Trifuoggi, Daniel Mark Lyons Ines Kovačić, Daniel Mark Lyons Marco Trifuoggi, Daniel Mark Lyons Maria Toscanesi, Marco Trifuoggi, Daniel Mark Lyons Maria Toscanesi, Philippe J. Thomas, Marco Trifuoggi, Petra Burić, Daniel Mark Lyons Maria Toscanesi, Daniel Mark Lyons

Summary

This review synthesized knowledge gaps in microplastic and nanoplastic ecotoxicology through a systematic analysis of the literature, identifying the most poorly understood exposure pathways, sensitive life stages, and ecosystem types, and proposing a research priority framework to guide future investigations.

The pervasive spread of microplastics (MPs) and nanoplastics (NPs) has raised significant concerns on their toxicity in both aquatic and terrestrial environments. These polymer-based materials have implications for plants, wildlife and human health, threatening food chain integrity and ultimate ecosystem resilience. An extensive - and growing - body of literature is available on MP- and NP-associated effects, including in a number of aquatic biota, with as yet limited reports in terrestrial environments. Effects range from no detectable, or very low level, biological effects to more severe outcomes such as (but not limited to) increased mortality rates, altered immune and inflammatory responses, oxidative stress, genetic damage and dysmetabolic changes. A well-established exposure route to MPs and NPs involves ingestion with subsequent incorporation into tissues. MP and NP exposures have also been found to lead to genetic damage, including effects related to mitotic anomalies, or to transmissible damage from sperm cells to their offspring, especially in echinoderms. Effects on the proteome, transcriptome and metabolome warrant ad hoc investigations as these integrated "omics" workflows could provide greater insight into molecular pathways of effect. Given their different physical structures, chemical identity and presumably different modes of action, exposure to different types of MPs and NPs may result in different biological effects in biota, thus comparative investigations of different MPs and NPs are required to ascertain the respective effects. Furthermore, research on MP and NP should also consider their ability to act as vectors for other toxicants, and possible outcomes of exposure may even include effects at the community level, thus requiring investigations in mesocosm models.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper