We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Resolving the effects of environmental micro- and nanoplastics exposure in biota: A knowledge gap analysis
AI summary Read the abstract
This review synthesized knowledge gaps in microplastic and nanoplastic ecotoxicology through a systematic analysis of the literature, identifying the most poorly understood exposure pathways, sensitive life stages, and ecosystem types, and proposing a research priority framework to guide future investigations.
The pervasive spread of microplastics (MPs) and nanoplastics (NPs) has raised significant concerns on their toxicity in both aquatic and terrestrial environments. These polymer-based materials have implications for plants, wildlife and human health, threatening food chain integrity and ultimate ecosystem resilience. An extensive - and growing - body of literature is available on MP- and NP-associated effects, including in a number of aquatic biota, with as yet limited reports in terrestrial environments. Effects range from no detectable, or very low level, biological effects to more severe outcomes such as (but not limited to) increased mortality rates, altered immune and inflammatory responses, oxidative stress, genetic damage and dysmetabolic changes. A well-established exposure route to MPs and NPs involves ingestion with subsequent incorporation into tissues. MP and NP exposures have also been found to lead to genetic damage, including effects related to mitotic anomalies, or to transmissible damage from sperm cells to their offspring, especially in echinoderms. Effects on the proteome, transcriptome and metabolome warrant ad hoc investigations as these integrated "omics" workflows could provide greater insight into molecular pathways of effect. Given their different physical structures, chemical identity and presumably different modes of action, exposure to different types of MPs and NPs may result in different biological effects in biota, thus comparative investigations of different MPs and NPs are required to ascertain the respective effects. Furthermore, research on MP and NP should also consider their ability to act as vectors for other toxicants, and possible outcomes of exposure may even include effects at the community level, thus requiring investigations in mesocosm models.
More Papers Like This
Micro and Nano-Plastics in the Environment: Research Priorities for the Near Future
AI summary Read the abstract
This perspectives paper identified the most important knowledge gaps in micro- and nanoplastic research, covering entry pathways into the environment, environmental fate, food web transfer, human health effects, and the role of associated chemicals and microorganisms.
Identifying Knowledge Gaps on Ecotoxicological Assessment of Micro/Nanoplastics with Aquatic Keystone Species
AI summary Read the abstract
This review identifies knowledge gaps in the ecotoxicological assessment of micro- and nanoplastics across aquatic and terrestrial organisms, highlighting inconsistencies in particle characterization, exposure concentrations, and endpoint selection that limit cross-study comparisons and risk assessment.
Ecological and toxicological manifestations of microplastics: current scenario, research gaps, and possible alleviation measures
AI summary Read the abstract
This review examines the ecological and toxicological effects of microplastics and their associated contaminants across aquatic and terrestrial environments, identifying key knowledge gaps and potential mitigation strategies. The authors emphasize that both physical particle effects and co-transported chemical pollutants pose compounding risks to wildlife and ecosystems.
Micro/nanoplastics in aquatic ecosystems: Analytical challenges, ecological impacts, and mitigation strategies
AI summary Read the abstract
This review provides a comprehensive assessment of micro- and nanoplastic pollution in aquatic ecosystems, covering detection methods, toxic effects across the food chain, and emerging cleanup strategies. Researchers highlight the limitations of current analytical techniques and the challenges of accurately measuring these tiny particles in water and living organisms. The study identifies key research priorities needed to better understand and mitigate the growing threat of plastic particle pollution in waterways.
Plastic Pollution and Ecosystem Health: Sources, Pathways, Impacts, and Mitigation Strategies
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers synthesized current knowledge on plastic pollution across terrestrial, freshwater, and marine ecosystems, tracing source pathways from industrial and domestic activities through fragmentation into microplastics and nanoplastics, and mapping impacts including trophic transfer, chemical toxicity, and biodiversity loss.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.