We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comparison of Deposition Sampling Methods to Collect Airborne Microplastics in Christchurch, New Zealand
AI summary Read the abstract
A pilot study in Christchurch, New Zealand tested four atmospheric deposition samplers for collecting airborne microplastics, finding open beakers and funnel samplers most effective, with fibers comprising 90% of collected particles. This Southern Hemisphere study helps address a major geographic gap in global airborne microplastic data and advances development of standardized monitoring protocols.
Airborne microplastics have been identified throughout the Northern Hemisphere in several studies. Synthesising measurements from multiple studies to derive a global distribution of airborne microplastics is difficult because no standard sampling protocol currently exists. Furthermore, measurements from the Southern Hemisphere are largely absent. We undertook a pilot study to test four different deposition samplers and their efficacy in collecting microplastics: a bottle with a funnel attached, an open beaker, a petri dish covered in double-sided adhesive tape and an automatic wet deposition collector. The four samplers were deployed to a suburban site in Christchurch, New Zealand, for four 6-day sampling periods. It was originally hypothesised that the funnel would improve sample retention by limiting resuspension; however, the open beaker was found to be similarly effective. We were unable to assess the effectiveness of the automatic wet deposition collector robustly due to low rainfall during the sampling periods. The adhesive tape sampler proved impractical. Particles collected from all samplers were inspected and classified as microplastics according to a visual screening criteria. Fibres, films, fragments and beads were identified, with fibres being the dominant morphotype (90%); however, only 10% of suspected microplastics were confirmed as plastic following μFTIR spectroscopy. Overall, we recommend the use of a funnel sampler or open beaker for future deposition studies. This is the first study of airborne microplastics in New Zealand and adds to a growing body of evidence as to the widespread nature of microplastics in the atmosphere.
More Papers Like This
Microplastics sampling methods and standardization requirements in atmospheric environment—a critical review
AI summary Read the abstract
A critical review of 92 atmospheric microplastic studies (2015–2023) found substantial inconsistency in sampling tools, exposure times, locations, and flow rates that severely limits the comparability of global air pollution data. Standardizing atmospheric sampling protocols is urgently needed to build a credible scientific basis for understanding how much microplastic people inhale daily and to support regulatory action.
Suspended airborne microplastics studies in Asia
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers reviewed the sources, distribution characteristics, and ecological risks of microplastics in global marine environments, summarizing how industrial discharge, domestic sewage, and maritime operations introduce MPs that then redistribute via ocean currents to affect ecosystems worldwide. Marine microplastics pose escalating risks to food webs—including filter feeders consumed by humans—making their tracking and reduction a global environmental priority.
Novel Techniques in Quantifying Microplastics in Atmospheric Particles
AI summary Read the abstract
This study developed novel analytical techniques for detecting and quantifying microplastics in atmospheric particles, addressing methodological gaps in measuring airborne plastic contamination in both remote and urban environments. Atmospheric microplastics represent an inhalation exposure pathway that is increasingly recognized as a significant contributor to total human microplastic body burden, making robust atmospheric quantification methods essential for health risk assessment.
Microplastics in ambient air: a review of atmospheric abundance, human exposure and urgent research needs
AI summary Read the abstract
This review pulled together findings from 84 studies to show that tiny plastic bits called microplastics are floating in the air everywhere, indoors, outdoors, in cities, and even in remote places like Antarctica, with tiny plastic fibers being the most common type found. Since we're breathing this stuff in daily, early research links it to lung inflammation, cell damage, and metabolic problems, though scientists say we still need more studies to understand exactly how much exposure is harmful and over what timeframe.
Understanding the dynamics and implications of airborne microplastics in atmosphere
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers reviewed the sources, distribution, and health risks of airborne microplastics, finding that fibrous particles raise particular concern due to prolonged residence in organisms, while smaller particles remain understudied, and calling for standardized sampling methods and long-term epidemiological studies to fill critical knowledge gaps.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.