We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Microplastic fibers affect dynamics and intensity of CO2 and N2O fluxes from soil differently
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers added plastic microfibers to agricultural soil and found that while the fibers increased carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions by improving soil aeration, they simultaneously decreased nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions by suppressing the denitrification process. These opposing effects on two major greenhouse gases mean microplastic soil contamination has complex and competing consequences for climate change.
Abstract Microplastics may affect soil ecosystem functioning in critical ways, with previously documented effects including changes in soil structure and water dynamics; this suggests that microbial populations and the processes they mediate could also be affected. Given the importance for global carbon and nitrogen cycle and greenhouse warming potential, we here experimentally examined potential effects of plastic microfiber additions on CO 2 and N 2 O greenhouse gas fluxes. We carried out a fully factorial laboratory experiment with the factors presence of microplastic fibers (0.4% w/w) and addition of urea fertilizer (100 mg N kg − 1 ) using one target soil. The conditions in an intensively N-fertilized arable soil were simulated by adding biogas digestate at the beginning of the incubation to all samples. We continuously monitored CO 2 and N 2 O emissions from soil before and after urea application using a custom-built flow-through steady-state system, and we assessed soil properties, including soil structure. Microplastics affected soil properties, notably increasing soil aggregate water-stability and pneumatic conductivity, and caused changes in the dynamics and overall level of emission of both gases, but in opposite directions: overall fluxes of CO 2 were increased by microplastic presence, whereas N 2 O emission were decreased, a pattern that was intensified following urea addition. This divergent response is explained by effects of microplastic on soil structure, with the increased air permeability likely improving O 2 supply: this will have stimulated CO 2 production, since mineralization benefits from better aeration. Increased O 2 would at the same time have inhibited denitrification, a process contributing to N 2 O emissions, thus likely explaining the decrease in the latter. Our results clearly suggest that microplastic consequences for greenhouse gas emissions should become an integral part of future impact assessments, and that to understand such responses, soil structure should be assessed.
More Papers Like This
Microplastic fibers affect dynamics and intensity of CO 2 and N 2 O fluxes from soil differently
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers conducted controlled experiments adding microplastic fibers to soil and measuring effects on carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide gas fluxes. The study found that microplastic fibers altered greenhouse gas emissions from soil differently for CO2 versus N2O, suggesting microplastics can disrupt soil biogeochemical cycling.
Effects of microplastics on greenhouse gas emissions and the microbial community in fertilized soil
AI summary Read the abstract
Two particle sizes of microplastics were added to fertilized soil and their effects on dissolved organic carbon, greenhouse gas fluxes, and microbial communities were measured, finding reduced global warming potential due to decreased methane emissions but changes in bacterial and fungal community composition. The study reveals complex interactions between microplastics and soil carbon cycling processes.
Effect of microplastics on carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus cycle in farmland soil: A meta-analysis
AI summary Read the abstract
This meta-analysis of 102 studies found that microplastics in farmland soil increased soil organic carbon, microbial biomass carbon, and microbial biomass nitrogen, but also elevated CO2, methane, and nitrous oxide emissions through enhanced carbon mineralization and denitrification. Microplastic biodegradability, size, concentration, and soil properties all drove these effects, suggesting agricultural microplastic pollution may worsen greenhouse gas emissions from farmland.
Effect of microplastics on soil greenhouse gas emissions: A global meta-analysis study
AI summary Read the abstract
This global meta-analysis found that microplastic exposure in soil decreased nitrous oxide emissions by 28.5% and increased methane emissions by 28.6%, though neither change was statistically significant overall. Effects varied dramatically depending on microplastic shape, concentration, soil type, and pH, with fiber-shaped microplastics reducing CO2 emissions by 40% while microplastics in sandy soils increased CO2 by 21%.
A Double‐Edged Sword of Biodegradable Microplastics on the Soil Microbial Carbon Pump
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers found that biodegradable microplastics in soil had a double-edged effect: they increased carbon dioxide emissions (contributing to greenhouse gases) but also boosted the efficiency of soil microbes at storing carbon in stable forms. This suggests microplastic pollution in farmland has complex environmental consequences that go beyond simple contamination, potentially affecting both climate change and long-term soil health.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.