0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Highest risk abandoned, lost and discarded fishing gear

Scientific Reports 2021 164 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 50 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Eric Gilman Eric Gilman Eric Gilman Michael K. Musyl, Petri Suuronen, Petri Suuronen, Saeid Gorgin, Milani Chaloupka, Petri Suuronen, Saeid Gorgin, Jono R. Wilson, Jono R. Wilson, Brandon Kuczenski, Eric Gilman

Summary

Researchers ranked fishing gear types by their derelict gear risk scores — combining production rates, fishing intensity, and documented harm to wildlife — finding that gillnets, longlines, and fish traps posed the highest risks, and recommending these as priority targets for derelict gear retrieval programs.

Derelict abandoned, lost and discarded fishing gear have profound adverse effects. We assessed gear-specific relative risks from derelict gear to rank-order fishing methods based on: derelict gear production rates, gear quantity indicators of catch weight and fishing grounds area, and adverse consequences from derelict gear. The latter accounted for ghost fishing, transfer of microplastics and toxins into food webs, spread of invasive alien species and harmful microalgae, habitat degradation, obstruction of navigation and in-use fishing gear, and coastal socioeconomic impacts. Globally, mitigating highest risk derelict gear from gillnet, tuna purse seine with fish aggregating devices, and bottom trawl fisheries achieves maximum conservation gains. Locally, adopting controls following a sequential mitigation hierarchy and implementing effective monitoring, surveillance and enforcement systems are needed to curb derelict gear from these most problematic fisheries. Primary and synthesis research are priorities to improve future risk assessments, produce the first robust estimate of global derelict gear quantity, and assess the performance of initiatives to manage derelict gear. Findings from this first quantitative estimate of gear-specific relative risks from derelict gear guide the allocation of resources to achieve the largest improvements from mitigating adverse effects of derelict gear from the world's 4.6 million fishing vessels.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper