0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Sign in to save

Environmental footprint of voltammetric sensors based on screen-printed electrodes: An assessment towards “green” sensor manufacturing

Chemosphere 2021 68 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 55 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Ashiq Ahamed, Liya Ge, Ke Zhao, Andrei Veksha, Johan Bobacka, Grzegorz Lisak

Summary

Researchers conducted a life cycle assessment of screen-printed electrodes used in environmental sensors, comparing different substrate and electrode materials. They found that replacing noble metal electrodes with carbon-based materials significantly reduced environmental impact, and that ceramic, glass, or paper substrates were preferable to plastic to avoid microplastic release. The study highlights that even sustainability-focused sensor technologies should consider their own environmental footprint, including microplastic generation.

Polymers

Voltammetric sensors based on screen-printed electrodes (SPEs) await diverse applications in environmental monitoring, food, agricultural and biomedical analysis. However, due to the single-use and disposable characteristics of SPEs and the scale of measurements performed, their environmental impacts should be considered. A life cycle assessment was conducted to evaluate the environmental footprint of SPEs manufactured using various substrate materials (SMs: cotton textile, HDPE plastic, Kraft paper, graphic paper, glass, and ceramic) and electrode materials (EMs: platinum, gold, silver, copper, carbon black, and carbon nanotubes (CNTs)). The greatest environmental impact was observed when cotton textile was used as SM. HDPE plastic demonstrated the least impact (13 out of 19 categories), followed by ceramic, glass and paper. However, considering the end-of-life scenarios and release of microplastics into the environment, ceramic, glass or paper could be the most suitable options for SMs. Amongst the EMs, the replacement of metals, especially noble metals, by carbon-based EMs greatly reduces the environmental footprint of SPEs. Compared with other materials, carbon black was the least impactful on the environment. On the other hand, copper and waste-derived CNTs (WCNTs) showed low impacts except for terrestrial ecotoxicity and human toxicity (non-cancer) potentials. In comparison to commercial CNTs (CCNTs), WCNTs demonstrated lower environmental footprint and comparable voltammetric performance in heavy metal detections, justifying the substitution of CCNTs with WCNTs in commercial applications. In conclusion, a combination of carbon black or WCNTs EMs with ceramic, glass or paper SMs represents the most environmentally friendly SPE configurations for voltammetric sensor arrangement.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Design, fabrication, and application of electrochemical sensors for microplastic detection: a state-of-the-art review and future perspectives

This review covers recent advances in electrochemical sensors for detecting microplastics in environmental samples, which offer advantages in sensitivity and portability over conventional laboratory methods. Researchers highlight strategies using nanomaterials, molecular imprinting, and surface-enhanced techniques to improve detection capabilities. The study suggests that electrochemical sensors represent a promising path toward affordable, rapid, on-site monitoring of microplastic pollution.

Article Tier 2

Electrochemical and physicochemical degradability evaluation of printed flexible carbon electrodes in seawater

Researchers developed a biodegradable, graphite-based electrode printed on a plant-derived plastic that can monitor water quality and dissolves quickly in seawater after use, offering an eco-friendly alternative to conventional sensor materials that leave behind non-degradable plastic and metal pollution.

Article Tier 2

Shellac-paper composite as a green substrate for printed electronics

Researchers developed a shellac-paper composite substrate as a biodegradable alternative to plastic films for printed electronics, demonstrating comparable electrical performance while avoiding the microplastic pollution generated by conventional polyethylene terephthalate substrates.

Article Tier 2

Coordinating the pore size of paper substrates and aspect ratio of silver nanowires to improve printed electronics

Researchers investigated how coordinating paper substrate pore size with silver nanowire aspect ratio improves printed electronics performance, developing paper-based substrates as biodegradable replacements for PET plastic in low-cost sensors to reduce micro- and nanoplastic pollution from discarded electronic devices.

Article Tier 2

Analysis of microplastics and nanoplastics: How green are the methodologies used?

This review evaluated the environmental footprint of the analytical methods used to study microplastics and nanoplastics, finding that many standard protocols rely on hazardous chemicals and high energy use, and recommending greener methodological alternatives.

Share this paper