0
Meta Analysis ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 1 ? Systematic review or meta-analysis. Synthesizes findings across many studies. Strongest evidence. Detection Methods Remediation Sign in to save

Unaccounted Microplastics in Wastewater Sludge: Where Do They Go?

ACS ES&T Water 2021 89 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Vera S. Koutnik, Sara Alkidim, Jamie Leonard, Francesca Deprima, Shangqing Cao, Eric M.V. Hoek, Sanjay K. Mohanty

Summary

This meta-analysis reveals that wastewater treatment plants capture microplastics from sewage, but 96% of those particles go unaccounted for in the resulting sludge. The researchers estimate that a significant amount of microplastics may be breaking down into even smaller nanoplastics during treatment, which are harder to detect and filter. This is concerning because wastewater sludge is commonly spread on farmland, potentially introducing plastic particles into our food supply.

Study Type Review

Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) could reintroduce microplastics into environments via biosolid application on land. Yet, the annual emission of microplastics via wastewater biosolids is unclear. Analyzing results from 76 studies, we estimate median concentrations of microplastics in influent, effluent, and sludge in various regions in the world and found that only 4% of microplastics removed in WWTPs are detected in the biosolids, and the remaining 96% could be unaccounted for. Unaccounted microplastics are attributed to limitations of current methodologies to isolate and identify small (<10 μm) microplastics in organic-rich sludge, although there is high variability in estimating the concentration in influent and effluent. A meta-analysis of microplastic data reveals that variability is high if a wastewater sample has low volume (<1 L, particularly for effluent), organic debris is not digested or digested without Fenton’s reagent, microplastics are isolated without density separation or using NaCl solution, and microplastics are counted using a microscope without spectroscopic identification. Based on the median concentration of microplastics in influent, effluent, and biosolids, land application of biosolids in the U.S. alone could annually release 785–1080 trillion microplastics, of which only 29–46 trillion are accounted for or detected. Thus, the true concentration of microplastics in biosolids could be significantly underestimated.

Share this paper