0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Sign in to save

Reducing environmental impacts from garments through best practice garment use and care, using the example of a Merino wool sweater

The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 2021 32 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 40 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Stephen G. Wiedemann, Leo Biggs, Quan Van Nguyen, Simon J. Clarke, Kirsi Laitala, Ingun Grimstad Klepp

Summary

This study used life cycle assessment to show that applying best-practice garment care — including reduced washing frequency, lower temperatures, and air drying — combined with extended use of a Merino wool sweater can substantially cut its cradle-to-grave environmental impact.

Study Type Environmental

Abstract Purpose Garment production and use generate substantial environmental impacts, and the care and use are key determinants of cradle-to-grave impacts. The present study investigated the potential to reduce environmental impacts by applying best practices for garment care combined with increased garment use. A wool sweater is used as an example because wool garments have particular attributes that favour reduced environmental impacts in the use phase. Methods A cradle-to-grave life cycle assessment (LCA) was used to compare six plausible best and worst-case practice scenarios for use and care of a wool sweater, relative to current practices. These focussed on options available to consumers to reduce impacts, including reduced washing frequency, use of more efficient washing machines, reduced use of machine clothing dryers, garment reuse by multiple users, and increasing number of garment wears before disposal. A sixth scenario combined all options. Worst practices took the worst plausible alternative for each option investigated. Impacts were reported per wear in Western Europe for climate change, fossil energy demand, water stress and freshwater consumption. Results and discussion Washing less frequently reduced impacts by between 4 and 20%, while using more efficient washing machines at capacity reduced impacts by 1 to 6%, depending on the impact category. Reduced use of machine dryer reduced impacts by < 5% across all indicators. Reusing garments by multiple users increased life span and reduced impacts by 25–28% across all indicators. Increasing wears from 109 to 400 per garment lifespan had the largest effect, decreasing impacts by 60% to 68% depending on the impact category. Best practice care, where garment use was maximised and care practices focussed on the minimum practical requirements, resulted in a ~ 75% reduction in impacts across all indicators. Unsurprisingly, worst-case scenarios increased impacts dramatically: using the garment once before disposal increased GHG impacts over 100 times. Conclusions Wool sweaters have potential for long life and low environmental impact in use, but there are substantial differences between the best, current and worst-case scenarios. Detailed information about garment care and lifespans is needed to understand and reduce environmental impacts. Opportunities exist for consumers to rapidly and dramatically reduce these impacts. The fashion industry can facilitate this through garment design and marketing that promotes and enables long wear life and minimal care.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Environmental Impacts in the Textile Sector: A Life Cycle Assessment Case Study of a Woolen Undershirt

A life cycle assessment of a woolen textile product quantified the environmental impacts across its production stages, using the study as a case example to demonstrate how LCA methodology can guide the textile industry toward lower-impact manufacturing.

Article Tier 2

Examining Practices of Apparel Use and End of Life in New Zealand

Researchers investigated laundry practices, garment lifetime wear, and end-of-life disposal behaviors for woollen and synthetic-blend knitted jumpers in New Zealand through an anonymous online survey. Results showed woollen garments were worn more times over their lifetime and washed less frequently than synthetic blends, with important implications for microplastic fiber shedding and textile waste in the region.

Article Tier 2

Advancing sustainability of textiles: a life cycle and microfiber emission assessment of locally manufactured circular sportswear

Researchers performed a full life cycle assessment of a circular-economy cycling jersey manufactured locally in Europe, finding that energy use was the dominant environmental impact and that marine microplastic emissions from synthetic fibers were comparable in harm to nutrient pollution. The study found that changes to manufacturing and consumer washing habits could reduce the jersey's environmental footprint by up to 33%.

Article Tier 2

Environmental assessment of Swedish clothing consumption – six garments, sustainable futures

A lifecycle assessment of six common garments purchased in Sweden found that production — especially fiber manufacturing — dominated the environmental footprint for most clothing types, while use-phase laundering contributed significantly for synthetic items. The study is relevant to microplastic pollution because synthetic textile washing releases microfibers during the use phase.

Article Tier 2

Calculating the Environmental Impact Reduction Due to Extended Lifespan of Clothing Through Clothing Swaps

Researchers developed and implemented an algorithm for calculating the environmental impact reduction achieved through clothing swaps on a peer-to-peer sharing platform, quantifying how extended garment lifespan reduces textile waste and associated microplastic fiber emissions.

Share this paper