0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Sign in to save

Are biodegradable plastics an environmental rip off?

Journal of Hazardous Materials 2021 79 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 45 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
João S.C. Viera, João S.C. Viera, Carlos Sanz‐Lázaro Carlos Sanz‐Lázaro Mônica Regina da Costa Marques, Carlos Sanz‐Lázaro Mônica Regina da Costa Marques, Carlos Sanz‐Lázaro Monick Cruz Nazareth, Monick Cruz Nazareth, Mônica Regina da Costa Marques, Mônica Regina da Costa Marques, Ítalo Braga Castro, Carlos Sanz‐Lázaro Carlos Sanz‐Lázaro Carlos Sanz‐Lázaro Carlos Sanz‐Lázaro Carlos Sanz‐Lázaro Carlos Sanz‐Lázaro Carlos Sanz‐Lázaro Carlos Sanz‐Lázaro Carlos Sanz‐Lázaro Ítalo Braga Castro, Ítalo Braga Castro, Ítalo Braga Castro, Paula C. Jimenez, Carlos Sanz‐Lázaro Carlos Sanz‐Lázaro Paula C. Jimenez, Ítalo Braga Castro, Ítalo Braga Castro, Carlos Sanz‐Lázaro Carlos Sanz‐Lázaro Carlos Sanz‐Lázaro Carlos Sanz‐Lázaro Mônica Regina da Costa Marques, Carlos Sanz‐Lázaro Ítalo Braga Castro, Carlos Sanz‐Lázaro Ítalo Braga Castro, Ítalo Braga Castro, Carlos Sanz‐Lázaro Ítalo Braga Castro, Carlos Sanz‐Lázaro Ítalo Braga Castro, Ítalo Braga Castro, Carlos Sanz‐Lázaro Carlos Sanz‐Lázaro Ítalo Braga Castro, Ítalo Braga Castro, Carlos Sanz‐Lázaro Carlos Sanz‐Lázaro

Summary

Researchers critically analyzed current technical standards used to certify plastic biodegradability and found that test conditions fail to reflect real-world aquatic and deep-sea environments where most plastic ends up, arguing that existing certifications may be misleading and that standards must be urgently revised to include deep-sea conditions, microplastic formation, and ecotoxicological endpoints.

While the use of biodegradable polymers is recognized as a global strategy to minimize plastic pollution, the technical standards (TS) used to attest their biodegradability may not be in compliance with most environmental parameters observed aquatic ecosystems. Indeed, through a careful assessment of the TS currently in use, this study evidenced that these guidelines cover only a fraction of the biogeochemical parameters seen in nature and largely disregard those that occur in the deep-sea. Thus, these TS may not be able to ensure the degradation of such polymers in natural environments, where microbial activity, pH, temperature, salinity, UV radiation and pressure are highly variable. This raises environmental concern, since relevant parcel of plastic ends up in the oceans reaching deep zones. Therefore, there is an urgent need to revise these TS, which must consider the actual fate of most plastic debris and include assessments under the challenging conditions found at these types of environment, alongside microplastic formation and ecotoxicology effects. Moreover, the next generation of biodegradability tests must be designed to enable a cost-effective implementation and incorporate accurate analytical techniques to assess polymer transformation. Furthermore, certification should provide information on time scale and degradation rates and, preferably, be globally harmonized.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper