Systematic Review
?
AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button.
Tier 1
?
Systematic review or meta-analysis. Synthesizes findings across many studies. Strongest evidence.
Environmental Sources
Sign in to save
Microplastics and plankton: Knowledge from laboratory and field studies to distinguish contamination from pollution
Journal of Hazardous Materials2021
77 citations
?
Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Score: 55
?
0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Sabrina M. Rodrigues,
Sabrina M. Rodrigues,
Sabrina M. Rodrigues,
Sabrina M. Rodrigues,
Sabrina M. Rodrigues,
Sandra Ramos,
Sabrina M. Rodrigues,
Sabrina M. Rodrigues,
Sabrina M. Rodrigues,
C. Marisa R. Almeida
Sabrina M. Rodrigues,
Sabrina M. Rodrigues,
C. Marisa R. Almeida
Michael Elliott,
Michael Elliott,
C. Marisa R. Almeida
Sandra Ramos,
C. Marisa R. Almeida
C. Marisa R. Almeida
Sabrina M. Rodrigues,
Sabrina M. Rodrigues,
Sabrina M. Rodrigues,
Michael Elliott,
Michael Elliott,
Michael Elliott,
Michael Elliott,
C. Marisa R. Almeida
C. Marisa R. Almeida
C. Marisa R. Almeida
C. Marisa R. Almeida
Michael Elliott,
Sandra Ramos,
Michael Elliott,
Michael Elliott,
Sabrina M. Rodrigues,
C. Marisa R. Almeida
Sabrina M. Rodrigues,
C. Marisa R. Almeida
Sabrina M. Rodrigues,
Sandra Ramos,
Sandra Ramos,
Sandra Ramos,
C. Marisa R. Almeida
C. Marisa R. Almeida
Sabrina M. Rodrigues,
Sabrina M. Rodrigues,
C. Marisa R. Almeida
Sabrina M. Rodrigues,
C. Marisa R. Almeida
Michael Elliott,
C. Marisa R. Almeida
Sabrina M. Rodrigues,
Sandra Ramos,
Sandra Ramos,
C. Marisa R. Almeida
Sandra Ramos,
C. Marisa R. Almeida
Sandra Ramos,
Sandra Ramos,
C. Marisa R. Almeida
C. Marisa R. Almeida
Sandra Ramos,
Sandra Ramos,
Sabrina M. Rodrigues,
Sandra Ramos,
C. Marisa R. Almeida
Michael Elliott,
Sandra Ramos,
C. Marisa R. Almeida
Sandra Ramos,
Sandra Ramos,
Sandra Ramos,
Sandra Ramos,
C. Marisa R. Almeida
Sandra Ramos,
C. Marisa R. Almeida
C. Marisa R. Almeida
Sandra Ramos,
Sandra Ramos,
Sandra Ramos,
C. Marisa R. Almeida
C. Marisa R. Almeida
Sandra Ramos,
C. Marisa R. Almeida
C. Marisa R. Almeida
Summary
Of 147 publications on microplastics and plankton, 70% were laboratory studies, and field-collected microplastics differed substantially from those used in experiments, making lab-to-field comparisons unreliable; population- and ecosystem-level pollution effects in natural settings remain largely unstudied.
Study Type
Review
Due to their ubiquitous presence, size and characteristics as ability to adsorb pollutants, microplastics are hypothesized as causing a major impact on smaller organisms, such as plankton. Despite this, there is a need to determine whether these impacts just relate to the environmental presence of the materials or their effects on biological processes. Therefore, we aimed to 1) review current research on plankton and microplastics; 2) compare field and laboratory experimental findings, and 3) identify knowledge gaps. The systematic review showed that 70% of the 147 relevant scientific publications were from laboratory studies and microplastics interactions with plankton were recorded in 88 taxa. Field study publications were relatively scarce and the characteristics of microplastics collected in the field were very different from those used in laboratory experiments thereby limiting the comparison between studies. Our systematic review highlighted knowledge gaps in: 1) the number of field studies; 2) the non-comparability between laboratory and field conditions, and 3) the low diversity of plankton species studied. Furthermore, this review indicated that while there are many studies on contamination by microplastics, the effects of this contamination (i.e., pollution per se) have been less well-studied, especially in the field at population, community, and ecosystem levels.