0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Human Health Effects Sign in to save

Considerations when using microplates and Neubauer counting chamber in ecotoxicity tests on microplastics

Marine Pollution Bulletin 2021 10 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Joana C. Prata, Cátia Venâncio, João Pinto da Costa, Isabel Lopes, Armando C. Duarte, Teresa Rocha‐Santos

Summary

This study identified microplate and Neubauer counting chamber materials as potential sources of microplastic contamination in ecotoxicity tests, recommending precautionary measures and alternative labware to reduce background contamination in experiments.

The ubiquity of microplastics raises issues regarding contamination control measures and laboratory practices. The objective was to adapt the use of counting chambers and plastic microplates on the ecotoxicity evaluation of microplastics. Counting chambers, originally used to quantify cells, can also be used to count high concentrations of microplastics (<100 μm) used in laboratory assays. By decontaminating the chamber and mixing the test solution with Nile Red (1:1), fluorescent particles can be easily counted under optical microscopy. Microplate wells, due to their composition, can be contaminated or release microplastics to the test medium, which can interfere with the results of ecotoxicity assays or spectroscopy readings. A cleaning method based on ethanol was developed, which effectively removed particles by 91% without interfering with microalgae yield. Besides providing practical applications that can improve ecotoxicity assays, this work intends to raise awareness on the need to adapt laboratory practices when working with microplastics.

Share this paper