0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Towards more ecologically relevant investigations of the impacts of microplastic pollution in freshwater ecosystems

The Science of The Total Environment 2021 60 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 45 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Αmy Ockenden, Αmy Ockenden, Nadia Dikareva, Αmy Ockenden, Nadia Dikareva, Nadia Dikareva, Nadia Dikareva, Nadia Dikareva, Louis A. Tremblay Nadia Dikareva, Αmy Ockenden, Αmy Ockenden, Kevin S. Simon, Kevin S. Simon, Louis A. Tremblay Louis A. Tremblay Nadia Dikareva, Louis A. Tremblay Louis A. Tremblay Αmy Ockenden, Nadia Dikareva, Louis A. Tremblay Louis A. Tremblay Louis A. Tremblay Kevin S. Simon, Kevin S. Simon, Kevin S. Simon, Kevin S. Simon, Louis A. Tremblay Kevin S. Simon, Louis A. Tremblay Louis A. Tremblay Louis A. Tremblay Louis A. Tremblay Louis A. Tremblay

Summary

This review argues that microplastic research in freshwater ecosystems lacks ecological realism, calling for studies that account for realistic exposure concentrations, particle mixtures, and multi-species interactions rather than single-species laboratory tests.

Study Type Environmental

Microplastic pollution is a major environmental concern and the subject of a rapidly growing body of research. Much of this research has focused on the direct effects of microplastics on single species and there is limited information on how microplastics affect different functional groups of organisms, multi-species interactions, and ecosystem processes. We focused on freshwater systems and reviewed 146 studies of microplastic effects on freshwater biota and recorded features including particle characteristics, study designs, functional types of species tested and ecotoxicological endpoints measured. Study species were categorized based on their ecosystem role/functional feeding group rather than taxonomy. We found that most studies were conducted on single species (95%) and focused on a narrow range of functional groups of organisms (mostly filter feeders, 37% of studies). Very few studies have investigated multi-species interactions and ecosystem processes. In many studies, certain characteristics of microplastics, such as polymer type were not well matched with the feeding and habitat ecology of test species, potentially reducing their ecological relevance. Median laboratory study test concentrations were 5-6 orders of magnitude higher than those reported in the field and few studies considered the effects of chemical additives in plastics (6%). We recommend that studies addressing the ecological effects of microplastics need to address neglected functional groups of organisms, design experiments to better match the ecology of test species, and increase in experimental scale and complexity to identify any indirect effects on species interactions and ecosystem processes. We suggest that examining microplastics through an ecological lens that better integrates the feeding and habitat ecology of test organisms will advance our understanding of the effects microplastics have in the environment.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper