0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Remediation Sign in to save

Dairy processing sludge and co-products: A review of present and future re-use pathways in agriculture

Journal of Cleaner Production 2021 97 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 45 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Wenxuan Shi, Wenxuan Shi, Wenxuan Shi, Mark G. Healy, Mark G. Healy, Mark G. Healy, S.M. Ashekuzzaman, Mark G. Healy, Mark G. Healy, S.M. Ashekuzzaman, Mark G. Healy, Karen Daly, Karen Daly, James J. Leahy, Owen Fenton Owen Fenton

Summary

This review examines reuse pathways for dairy processing sludge in agriculture, identifying gaps in knowledge about nutrient value and calling for testing of contaminants including microplastics and nanoplastics before land application.

Body Systems
Study Type Environmental

The dairy industry is one of the largest global producers of wastewater and generates huge volumes of dairy processing sludge (DPS). There are two main types of DPS, lime-treated dissolved air floatation sludge and bio-chemically-treated activated sludge. These sludge types may also be converted to STRUBIAS (STRUvite, BIochar, AShes) products which have potential as fertilizers, secondary feedstocks for phosphate fertiliser granules, and soil amendments. A small number of studies indicate that these products have variable nutrient and metal contents, which differ across sludge and STRUBIAS product types. This is due to many factors such as the type of dairy plants, wastewater treatment process and production technologies. Although such products are land applied, the phosphorus (P) and nitrogen (N) fertilizer equivalency value (FEV) are often unknown and not factored into application rates, and therefore need study under field conditions (across soil and crop types). This review identifies a need to quantify antimicrobial drugs, hormones, pesticides, disinfectants, persistent organic pollutants (POPs), microplastics and nano-particles in all DPS and STRUBIAS types. Where detected, testing should follow the transfer of these contaminants to the soil, crop and water continuum. Further knowledge in the areas identified would enable both agronomic and environmental goals to be met and promote higher uptake of DPS and STRUBIAS re-use in agriculture.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper