We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
The plastic Trojan horse: Biofilms increase microplastic uptake in marine filter feeders impacting microbial transfer and organism health
Summary
Researchers found that microplastics colonized by microbial biofilms, which better represent environmental conditions, are ingested at higher rates by marine filter feeders than clean, virgin microbeads typically used in laboratory studies. The biofilm coating also introduced potentially harmful bacteria into the organisms that consumed them. The study suggests that previous research using pristine microplastics may have underestimated both the uptake rate and biological risks of microplastic ingestion in marine ecosystems.
Microplastic pollution has become a major source of concern, with a large body of literature surrounding the impacts of microplastic ingestion by biota. However, many of these studies utilise virgin microbeads, which are not reflective of environmental microplastics that are rapidly colonised with microbial communities (plastisphere) in marine ecosystems. It is a concern therefore that current evidence of the impacts of microplastics on biota are unrepresentative of the environmental microplastic pollution. In this study, uptake and bioaccumulation of both virgin and Escherichia coli coated microplastics, by European native oysters (Ostrea edulis) were compared, and the physiological responses of oysters to the exposure were investigated. The uptake of E. coli coated microplastics was found to be significantly higher than the uptake of virgin microplastics, with average concentrations of 42.3 ± 23.5 no. g and 11.4 ± 0.6 no. g microbeads found in oysters exposed to coated and virgin microplastics, respectively. This suggests that environmental microplastic uptake into the marine trophic web by benthic filter feeders may be greater than previously thought. The oxygen consumption and respiration rate of oysters exposed to E. coli coated microplastics increased significantly over time, whilst virgin microplastics did not produce any measurable significant physiological responses. However, less than 0.5% of the total amount of administered microbeads were retained by all oysters, suggesting a limited residence time within the organisms. Although microplastics did not bioaccumulate in oyster tissues in the short-term, microorganisms assimilated by the ingestion of coated microplastics may be transferred to higher trophic levels. This poses a risk, not only for wildlife, but also for food safety and human health. The capacity to carry pathogens and expose a wide range of organisms to them means microplastics may have an important role as vectors for disease.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Impact of Microbial Colonization of Polystyrene Microbeads on the Toxicological Responses in the Sea Urchin .
Sea urchins were more likely to internalize polystyrene microbeads coated with a bacterial biofilm than clean beads, suggesting that the ecological corona of microorganisms on plastic surfaces plays a role in how organisms interact with plastic particles. This finding helps explain how microplastics in the ocean are taken up by marine invertebrates and how the plastisphere changes the ecological risks of plastic pollution.
Biofilm enhances the interactive effects of microplastics and oxytetracycline on zebrafish intestine
Researchers found that microplastics coated with bacterial biofilms (natural microbial layers that form in water) caused more intestinal damage to zebrafish than clean microplastics. The biofilm-coated particles increased pathogenic bacteria in the gut by several times and significantly boosted antibiotic resistance genes. This matters because microplastics in real-world water are almost always coated with biofilms, meaning the actual health risks from waterborne microplastics may be greater than lab studies using clean particles suggest.
The Importance of Biofilms to the Fate and Effects of Microplastics
This review examines how biofilms — communities of microorganisms that form on microplastic surfaces — affect the fate and ecological effects of plastic pollution. Biofilm formation alters how microplastics are transported, ingested, and degraded in the environment, and the plastisphere can harbor pathogens and antibiotic-resistant bacteria that may pose risks to human health.
Impacts of microplastics and the associated plastisphere on physiological, biochemical, genetic expression and gut microbiota of the filter-feeder amphioxus
Researchers exposed filter-feeding amphioxus to weathered microplastics colonized by natural marine biofilms and found significant impacts on physiology, biochemistry, and gut microbiota under starvation conditions. The weathered plastics with their attached microbial communities caused more disruption than pristine particles typically used in lab studies. The findings suggest that real-world microplastic pollution, complete with its biofilm coating, may pose greater risks to marine filter feeders than laboratory experiments usually indicate.
The role of microbe-microplastic associations in marine Nematode feeding behaviors
Researchers found that microbial biofilms growing on microplastics influenced marine nematode feeding behavior, with nematodes showing preferential consumption of biofilm-coated particles, suggesting that microbial colonization plays a key role in why organisms ingest microplastics.