0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Remediation Sign in to save

Removal of rubber, bitumen and other microplastic particles from stormwater by a gross pollutant trap - bioretention treatment train

Water Research 2021 125 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 50 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Katharina Lange, Katharina Lange, Katharina Lange, Kerstin Magnusson Kerstin Magnusson Katharina Lange, Katharina Lange, Kerstin Magnusson Kerstin Magnusson Godecke‐Tobias Blecken, Kerstin Magnusson Katharina Lange, Kerstin Magnusson Maria Viklander, Kerstin Magnusson Maria Viklander, Kerstin Magnusson Maria Viklander, Maria Viklander, Kerstin Magnusson Kerstin Magnusson Kerstin Magnusson Kerstin Magnusson Maria Viklander, Godecke‐Tobias Blecken, Godecke‐Tobias Blecken, Godecke‐Tobias Blecken, Maria Viklander, Kerstin Magnusson Godecke‐Tobias Blecken, Godecke‐Tobias Blecken, Kerstin Magnusson Kerstin Magnusson Maria Viklander, Godecke‐Tobias Blecken, Godecke‐Tobias Blecken, Kerstin Magnusson Maria Viklander, Maria Viklander, Maria Viklander, Maria Viklander, Kerstin Magnusson Kerstin Magnusson Kerstin Magnusson Maria Viklander, Kerstin Magnusson Kerstin Magnusson Kerstin Magnusson Kerstin Magnusson Maria Viklander, Maria Viklander, Kerstin Magnusson Godecke‐Tobias Blecken, Kerstin Magnusson Maria Viklander, Godecke‐Tobias Blecken, Maria Viklander, Kerstin Magnusson Kerstin Magnusson Kerstin Magnusson

Summary

Researchers tested a gross pollutant trap followed by a bioretention cell as a stormwater treatment train in Australia and found it effectively removed over 95% of rubber, bitumen, and other microplastic particles larger than 100 µm, demonstrating the potential of combined treatment systems.

Microplastic particles in stormwater pose significant threats to the environment. This study investigated how effective a stormwater treatment train was at removing rubber, bitumen and other microplastics (incl. fibers, fragments, and paint particles) in the 100-300 µm and >300 µm size fractions from highway runoff. The two treatment trains comprise a gross pollutant trap (GPT) followed by either a vegetated bioretention cell or non-vegetated sand filter. Flow-proportional composite samples were taken from the highway runoff, GPT outflow and the outflow from the two parallel filters during nine rain events to determine overall treatment performance, as well as the performance of individual system components. The identified rubber, bitumen and other microplastic particles mainly represented the 100-300 µm fraction and included high ratios of rubber (30%) and bitumen (60%). Overall, the treatment train efficiently removed rubber, bitumen and other microplastic particles in the 100-300 µm size fraction from the stormwater. The filter cells accounted for a major share of this removal, as the GPT did not reduce microplastic particle concentrations. This observation is likely explained by the fact that the rubber, bitumen and other microplastic particles have a density close to the density of water and thus removal by sedimentation is decreased. This identified an inherent weakness of the system; more specifically, the high microplastic concentrations in the surface water of the GPT means there can be a risk of microplastic release through overflow pits when inflows surpass the system capacity. Despite some differences, both the vegetated bioretention cell and the non-vegetated sand filter removed rubber, bitumen and other microplastic particles to similar extent.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper