0
Article Tier 2 Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Remediation Sign in to save

Removal of rubber, bitumen and other microplastic particles from stormwater by a gross pollutant trap - bioretention treatment train

Water Research 2021 125 citations

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers tested a gross pollutant trap followed by a bioretention cell as a stormwater treatment train in Australia and found it effectively removed over 95% of rubber, bitumen, and other microplastic particles larger than 100 µm, demonstrating the potential of combined treatment systems.

Microplastic particles in stormwater pose significant threats to the environment. This study investigated how effective a stormwater treatment train was at removing rubber, bitumen and other microplastics (incl. fibers, fragments, and paint particles) in the 100-300 µm and >300 µm size fractions from highway runoff. The two treatment trains comprise a gross pollutant trap (GPT) followed by either a vegetated bioretention cell or non-vegetated sand filter. Flow-proportional composite samples were taken from the highway runoff, GPT outflow and the outflow from the two parallel filters during nine rain events to determine overall treatment performance, as well as the performance of individual system components. The identified rubber, bitumen and other microplastic particles mainly represented the 100-300 µm fraction and included high ratios of rubber (30%) and bitumen (60%). Overall, the treatment train efficiently removed rubber, bitumen and other microplastic particles in the 100-300 µm size fraction from the stormwater. The filter cells accounted for a major share of this removal, as the GPT did not reduce microplastic particle concentrations. This observation is likely explained by the fact that the rubber, bitumen and other microplastic particles have a density close to the density of water and thus removal by sedimentation is decreased. This identified an inherent weakness of the system; more specifically, the high microplastic concentrations in the surface water of the GPT means there can be a risk of microplastic release through overflow pits when inflows surpass the system capacity. Despite some differences, both the vegetated bioretention cell and the non-vegetated sand filter removed rubber, bitumen and other microplastic particles to similar extent.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Occurrence and concentration of 20–100 μm sized microplastic in highway runoff and its removal in a gross pollutant trap – Bioretention and sand filter stormwater treatment train

AI summary Read the abstract

A stormwater gross pollutant trap followed by bioretention and sand filter treatment was found to remove 20 to 100 micrometer microplastics from highway runoff in addition to larger particles, with removal efficiency dependent on particle size and treatment train configuration.

Article Tier 2

Microplastics Characterization in Stormwater: Pavement Source Evaluation and Treatment Efficiency of a Bioretention Cell

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers characterised microplastics in stormwater from pavement sources and evaluated the treatment efficiency of a bioretention cell, finding that pavement surfaces contribute substantially to microplastic loading and that bioretention can reduce particle concentrations.

Article Tier 2

Analysis of Bioretention Capability in Removing Microplastic Particles from Stormwater

AI summary Read the abstract

This study tested the ability of bioretention systems (vegetated stormwater gardens) to remove microplastic particles from stormwater, finding effective removal across multiple particle sizes and types. Bioretention infrastructure shows promise as a practical tool for preventing microplastics from stormwater runoff from reaching rivers and coastal waters.

Article Tier 2

Innovative bioretention filters effectively remove microplastics from polluted stormwater

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers evaluated a pilot rain garden facility with 13 bioretention filters incorporating sorbent materials including waste-to-energy bottom ash, biochar, and Sphagnum peat mixed with sandy loam, testing their ability to remove microplastics from highway stormwater over 48 months using pyrolysis-GC/MS analysis. They found that the innovative filters effectively reduced microplastic concentrations across all 13 target polymers, with polyisoprene and styrene-butadiene rubber among the highest-concentration contaminants in the stormwater inflow.

Article Tier 2

Innovative bioretention filters effectively remove microplastics from polluted stormwater

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers constructed a pilot rain garden facility with 13 bioretention filters incorporating innovative sorbent materials — waste-to-energy bottom ash, biochar, and Sphagnum peat — mixed with sandy loam and planted with salt-tolerant vegetation, then irrigated with stormwater from a highway over 48 months to evaluate microplastic removal efficiency by pyrolysis-GC/MS. They found the bioretention filters effectively removed diverse microplastic polymers from urban stormwater, with all 13 target polymers detected in inflow and variable removal efficiencies across sorbent treatments.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper