0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Food & Water Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Systems Thinking Research in Science and Sustainability Education: A Theoretical Note

2021 9 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 40 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Güliz Karaarslan Semız

Summary

This theoretical review examined systems thinking in science and sustainability education, critically analyzing the contradictions within sustainable development education and arguing that truly transformative environmental education must challenge anthropocentric assumptions embedded in SDG frameworks.

Despite the willingness of many educational institutions worldwide to embrace Education for Sustainable Development and Education for Sustainable Development Goals, critical scholars have pointed out that the very enterprise of sustainable development is not without its contradictions. Therefore, any education that engages with sustainable development needs to be carefully reviewed, rather than supported, in its ambition to promote the supposedly universally desirable aims. The rhetoric of sustainable development as meeting the needs of present and future generations is largely anthropocentric in failing to take nonhuman species into account when setting up pragmatic and ethical objectives. Similarly to the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) that have helped to raise living standards across the world, but have largely failed to address environmental sustainability challenges, the Sustainability Development Goals (SDGs) tend to prioritize "inclusive economic growth" at the expense of ecological integrity, which is very likely to negatively affect not only nonhuman species but also future generations and their quality of life. Thus, as this chapter will argue, universally applicable Education for Sustainable Development Goals (ESDGs) is problematic in the context of addressing the long-term sustainability for both human and nonhuman inhabitants of the planet. Given escalating climate change, biodiversity loss, pollution, and depletion of natural resources, this chapter questions whether ESDGs can qualify as a desirable "quality education". The paradoxes of sustainable development and ways forward that seem a better alternative for ESDG include indigenous/traditional learning, ecopedagogy, ecocentric education, and education for degrowth, steady-state, and Cradle-to-Cradle and circular economy. Advantages of universal education are also highlighted, as any education that supports basic literacy, numeracy, and values attributed to the intrinsic rights of humans and nonhumans can help students to be equipped to deal with social and environmental challenges. xii High Quality Educated Teachers and High-Quality Textbooks-The Two Pillars of Quality Education by Maria Hofman-Bergholm

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Transitioning to Quality Education: Examining Education for Sustainable Development Goals, Its Limitations, and Alternatives

This chapter critically examined Education for Sustainable Development Goals, arguing that the SDG framework prioritizes economic growth in ways that undermine ecological sustainability, and proposing alternative educational approaches that center non-anthropocentric values and long-term ecological integrity over inclusive growth narratives.

Article Tier 2

The Importance of Environmental Sustainability for Healthy Ageing and The Incorporation of Systems Thinking in Education for A Sustainable Environment

This paper argues that environmental sustainability is a prerequisite for healthy ageing in an increasingly elderly global population, reviewing evidence linking chemical pollution, climate change, and ecosystem degradation to age-related disease. The authors call for systems thinking education to train public health professionals to address environmental sustainability as a core component of healthy ageing policy.

Article Tier 2

Social fields and natural systems: integrating knowledge about society and nature

This theoretical paper proposes combining sociological field theory with systems thinking to better analyze sustainability challenges. The integrated approach could help researchers understand how social structures shape human responses to environmental problems like plastic pollution.

Article Tier 2

The Symbiotic Curriculum: A Conceptual Framework for Integrating the SDGs Through Transformative Eco-Pedagogy

This paper introduces 'The Symbiotic Curriculum', a conceptual framework for integrating the UN Sustainable Development Goals into education through transformative eco-pedagogy grounded in Freire's critical pedagogy, Bronfenbrenner's ecological systems theory, and Mezirow's transformative learning. The framework treats the SDGs as interconnected rather than siloed topics, aiming to cultivate holistic competencies for sustainability.

Article Tier 2

A Retrospective Approach to Pro-Environmental Behavior from Environmental Education: An Alternative from Sustainable Development

This 20-year bibliometric retrospective on environmental education and pro-environmental behaviour research found a persistent gap between acquiring environmental knowledge and changing behaviour, concluding that participatory pedagogical approaches and greater integration of sustainable development into higher education are needed to bridge this divide.

Share this paper