0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Human Health Effects Sign in to save

Opportunities regarding the use of technologies of energy recovery from sewage sludge

SN Applied Sciences 2021 34 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 40 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Anca Maria Zaharioiu, Felicia Bucura, Roxana Elena Ionete, Florian Marin, Marius Constantinescu, Simona Oancea

Summary

This review evaluated pyrolysis, gasification, and incineration as energy recovery technologies for sewage sludge management, finding pyrolysis advantageous due to low emissions, reduced heavy metal mobility, and useful by-products including bio-gas, bio-oil, and bio-char adsorbents.

Abstract Based on the global need to efficiently eliminate highly produced amounts of sewage sludge, alternative technologies are required to be practically developed. Reduction of sewage sludge waste quantities with energy recovery is the most important and modern practice, with least possible impact on the environment. Appropriate technologies for treating and disposal sewage sludge are currently considered: incineration, gasification and pyrolysis. The main products generated during the pyrolysis process are bio-gas, bio-oil and bio-residue, providing sustainable fuels/ biofuels and adsorbents. Compared to other disposal methods of sewage sludge, pyrolysis has advantages in terms of the environment: waste in small quantities, low emissions, low level of heavy metals. From a technological point of view, pyrolysis is the most efficient in relation to its final products, pyrolysis oil, pyrolysis gas and solid residue that can be transformed into CO 2 adsorbent with the help of chemical and thermal activation processes. The incineration process of sewage sludge has a number of disadvantages both environmentally and technologically: organic pollutants, heavy metals, toxic pollutants and ash resulting from combustion that needs a disposal process. A comparison of different types of sewage sludge elimination for the energy recovery is described in the present paper. Article Highlights Sewage sludge is a waste in increasing quantities, which requires disposal and energy recovery, in a clean way for the environment. The pyrolysis process of sewage sludge is the cleanest method of its recovery. Pyrolysis products, bio-oil, syngas and biochar, can be used as alternative fuels to fossil fuels. The pyrolysis process of the sewage sludge is the most advantageous from the point of view of the obtained products and of the environment, in comparison with the incineration and gasification processes.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Energy recovery from sewage sludge waste blends: Detailed characteristics of pyrolytic oil and gas

Laboratory-scale co-pyrolysis of sewage sludge blended with polyethylene, polypropylene, paper rejects, and waste tyres produced pyrolytic oils and gases with detailed chemical characterizations relevant to assessing this approach for energy recovery from mixed waste streams.

Article Tier 2

Integrating Pyrolysis or Combustion with Scrubbing to Maximize the Nutrient and Energy Recovery from Municipal Sewage Sludge

This study modeled how combining pyrolysis or combustion with gas scrubbing could recover heat and nutrients from municipal sewage sludge at wastewater treatment plants. Since sewage sludge is a major sink for microplastics, improved sludge management is relevant to reducing the spread of microplastics through biosolid land application.

Article Tier 2

Life cycle assessment of sewage sludge treatment: Comparison of pyrolysis with traditional methods in two Swedish municipalities

Researchers compared pyrolysis, a heat-based treatment that converts sewage sludge into biochar, against traditional disposal methods in two Swedish municipalities using life cycle assessment. They found that using biochar as a fertilizer replacement offered significant environmental benefits, and combining anaerobic digestion with pyrolysis was the most environmentally friendly option. The approach also has the advantage of breaking down pollutants like microplastics and pathogens present in sewage sludge.

Article Tier 2

Pyrolysis Solves the Issue of Organic Contaminants in Sewage Sludge while Retaining Carbon—Making the Case for Sewage Sludge Treatment via Pyrolysis

Pyrolysis of sewage sludge was evaluated as a treatment that destroys organic contaminants including pharmaceuticals, microplastics, and PFAS while retaining carbon and plant nutrients in the resulting biochar, but the authors noted that current EU fertilizer regulations do not yet recognize sewage sludge biochar as an eligible product, creating a policy barrier to its adoption.

Article Tier 2

The Pyrolysis of Biosolids in a Novel Closed Coupled Pyrolysis and Gasification Technology: Pilot Plant Trials, Aspen Plus Modelling, and a Techno-Economic Analysis

Researchers tested a novel closed-coupled pyrolysis and gasification system for processing biosolids (sewage sludge), measuring energy recovery and the fate of contaminants including microplastics during thermal treatment. The system achieved high energy recovery while thermally destroying microplastics present in the biosolids.

Share this paper