0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Nanoplastics Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Single-Use Plastic Bans: Exploring Stakeholder Perspectives on Best Practices for Reducing Plastic Pollution

Environments 2021 50 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 45 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Rachel Tiller, Ana Rotter, Emily Cowan, Emily Cowan, Emily Cowan, Emily Cowan, Emily Cowan, Rachel Tiller, Rachel Tiller, Andy M. Booth, Rachel Tiller, Rachel Tiller, Rachel Tiller, Rachel Tiller, Rachel Tiller, Rachel Tiller, Andy M. Booth, Andy M. Booth, Andy M. Booth, Andy M. Booth, Andy M. Booth, Andy M. Booth, Andy M. Booth, Andy M. Booth, Andreas Misund, Andreas Misund, Ana Rotter, Andy M. Booth, Andy M. Booth, Andy M. Booth, Andy M. Booth, Andy M. Booth, Andy M. Booth, Andy M. Booth, Andy M. Booth, Andy M. Booth, Andy M. Booth, Andy M. Booth, Andy M. Booth, Rachel Tiller, Emily Cowan, Katja Klun Andy M. Booth, Rachel Tiller, Andy M. Booth, Andy M. Booth, Andy M. Booth, Andy M. Booth, Andy M. Booth, Andy M. Booth, Andy M. Booth, Andy M. Booth, Andy M. Booth, Andy M. Booth, Andy M. Booth, Andy M. Booth, Andy M. Booth, Rachel Tiller, Rachel Tiller, Emily Cowan, Ana Rotter, Katja Klun Katja Klun Andreas Misund, Andreas Misund, Andy M. Booth, Ana Rotter, Andy M. Booth, Ana Rotter, Katja Klun Andy M. Booth, Andy M. Booth, Andy M. Booth, Rachel Tiller, Andy M. Booth, Rachel Tiller, Andy M. Booth, Emily Cowan, Emily Cowan, Andy M. Booth, Andy M. Booth, Andy M. Booth, Andy M. Booth, Emily Cowan, Andy M. Booth, Andy M. Booth, Andy M. Booth, Emily Cowan, Emily Cowan, Emily Cowan, Emily Cowan, Andy M. Booth, Andy M. Booth, Ana Rotter, Andy M. Booth, Andy M. Booth, Andy M. Booth, Andy M. Booth, Andy M. Booth, Andy M. Booth, Andy M. Booth, Andy M. Booth, Andy M. Booth, Andy M. Booth, Rachel Tiller, Katja Klun Andy M. Booth, Andy M. Booth, Andy M. Booth, Andy M. Booth, Andy M. Booth, Andy M. Booth, Rachel Tiller, Andy M. Booth, Andy M. Booth, Ana Rotter, Andy M. Booth, Andy M. Booth, Andy M. Booth, Andy M. Booth, Andy M. Booth, Andy M. Booth, Andy M. Booth, Andy M. Booth, Andy M. Booth, Andy M. Booth, Andy M. Booth, Andy M. Booth, Andy M. Booth, Katja Klun Andy M. Booth, Andy M. Booth, Andy M. Booth, Andy M. Booth, Andy M. Booth, Andy M. Booth, Katja Klun

Summary

Stakeholder workshops in Norway and Slovenia identified single-use plastic bans as broadly supported but requiring better complementary policies including deposit return systems and product redesign requirements, with participants emphasizing that bans alone are insufficient without parallel infrastructure investments and behavior change programs.

In this study, we conducted and documented workshops and interviews in Norway and Slovenia to identify stakeholder and future generation opinions and mitigation strategies for solving one of the most prominent environmental issues: plastic pollution. As part of the EU H2020 project GoJelly, stakeholders were brought together to explore their perceptions on considering jellyfish mucus as a new resource to contribute to reducing plastic pollution from entering the marine environment. The study was conducted in the spring of 2019, in a context directly after the European Union (EU) announced its Directive to ban the most commonly used single-use plastic (SUP) items. The study applied the snowball method as a methodological choice to identify relevant stakeholders. Systems thinking was utilized as a participatory modelling approach, which allowed for the creation of conceptual mind maps from the various workshops and interviews, to understand consumers’ consciousness, and to map out ideas on plastic pollution reduction. Plastic pollution takes place on a global scale and stakeholders discussed their individual perceptions of national and international solutions that could be put in place to solve it, including the opportunities around utilizing jellyfish mucus to filter and capture micro- and nanoplastic. We found that industry stakeholders in both case areas were generally more accepting of policy and increased innovation moving forward, but placed weight on the scientific community to conduct more research on the pollution issue and propose solutions. Future generation stakeholders (youth aged 14–18), however, put emphasis on consumer behavior and buying patterns of single-use products fueling the plastic crisis.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper