We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Estuaries as Filters for Riverine Microplastics: Simulations in a Large, Coastal-Plain Estuary
AI summary Read the abstract
Hydrodynamic simulations of a large US coastal plain estuary found that estuaries function as effective filters for riverine microplastics by promoting particle settling and biofouling-induced sinking, potentially explaining the discrepancy between high river inputs and relatively lower microplastic concentrations observed in coastal ocean surveys.
Public awareness of microplastics and their widespread presence throughout most bodies of water are increasingly documented. The accumulation of microplastics in the ocean, however, appears to be far less than their riverine inputs, suggesting that there is a “missing sink” of plastics in the ocean. Estuaries have long been recognized as filters for riverine material in marine biogeochemical budgets. Here we use a model of estuarine microplastic transport to test the hypothesis that the Chesapeake Bay, a large coastal-plain estuary in eastern North America, is a potentially large filter, or “sink,” of riverine microplastics. The 1-year composite simulation, which tracks an equal number of buoyant and sinking 5-mm diameter particles, shows that 94% of riverine microplastics are beached, with only 5% exported from the Bay, and 1% remaining in the water column. We evaluate the robustness of this finding by conducting additional simulations in a tributary of the Bay for different years, particle densities, particle sizes, turbulent dissipation rates, and shoreline characteristics. The resulting microplastic transport and fate were sensitive to interannual variability over a decadal (2010–2019) analysis, with greater export out of the Bay during high streamflow years. Particle size was found to be unimportant while particle density – specifically if a particle was buoyant or not – was found to significantly influence overall fate and mean duration in the water column. Positively buoyant microplastics are more mobile due to being in the seaward branch of the residual estuarine circulation while negatively buoyant microplastics are transported a lesser distance due to being in the landward branch, and therefore tend to deposit on coastlines close to their river sources, which may help guide sampling campaigns. Half of all riverine microplastics that beach do so within 7–13 days, while those that leave the bay do so within 26 days. Despite microplastic distributions being sensitive to some modeling choices (e.g., particle density and shoreline hardening), in all scenarios most of riverine plastics do not make it to the ocean, suggesting that estuaries may serve as a filter for riverine microplastics.
More Papers Like This
Deposition of microplastics in estuaries: critical review of field and experimental data from the perspective of the Ocean Marginal Filter concept
AI summary Read the abstract
This review examined how estuaries filter microplastics transported from rivers to the sea, applying the classical Ocean Marginal Filter framework that identifies gravitational settling, sorption, and bio-assimilation as key retention mechanisms. Field studies confirm estuaries trap a significant fraction of riverine microplastics, though data remain inconsistent across regions.
Settling of buoyant microplastic in estuaries: The importance of flocculation
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers demonstrated that flocculation causes buoyant microplastics to settle 5-21 times faster in estuarine waters than in freshwater, supporting the concept that estuaries act as traps that reduce the overall microplastic load reaching the open ocean.
Trapping of floating MP in estuaries, the importance of flocculation
AI summary Read the abstract
Laboratory experiments showed that when microplastics enter estuaries and encounter salt water, they can become entangled in flocs — aggregates of organic particles and sediment — causing them to sink and be trapped in estuarine sediments rather than reaching the open ocean. This flocculation process in estuaries may represent a major, previously underestimated sink for river-borne microplastics. Understanding this trapping mechanism is important for accurately predicting how much plastic actually makes it from rivers to the sea.
Physical drivers of transport, dispersion and trapping of microplastics in a macrotidal, hyper-turbid fluvial–estuarine system: A modelling approach
AI summary Read the abstract
Estuaries — where rivers meet the ocean — act like traps for microplastics, with tides, sediment, and shoreline interactions causing much of this plastic pollution to get stuck rather than flushed out to sea. This matters because these are often the same waters used for fishing and shellfish harvesting, meaning trapped microplastics may build up in local food sources over time rather than dispersing and diluting in the open ocean.
Transport and retention of sinking microplastics in a well-mixed estuary
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers used numerical particle-tracking experiments to examine how sinking microplastics are retained in well-mixed estuaries under varying tidal and freshwater flow conditions. They found that over 90% of sinking particles were retained in the estuary, with retention rates highly sensitive to particle density and size. The study confirms that estuaries can act as significant accumulation zones for microplastics, trapping particles before they reach the open ocean.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.