We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Microplastic concentrations, characteristics, and fluxes in water bodies of the Tollense catchment, Germany, with regard to different sampling systems
Summary
Researchers quantified microplastics larger than 20 µm in freshwater bodies of the Tollense catchment in northeastern Germany using in situ pump filtration, finding widespread contamination and highlighting how methodological differences — particularly sampling systems — make cross-study comparisons difficult. The study emphasizes the need for standardized microplastic sampling protocols in freshwater environments.
The widespread presence of microplastics in multiple environmental compartments has largely been demonstrated. Assessing the ecological risk that microplastics pose is, at the present stage, hindered due to methodical differences. Moreover, different methods hamper meaningful comparisons between studies and data on microplastics <300 μm is scarce. Therefore, we focused on microplastics >20 μm in freshwater and sampling-related aspects in this concern. Sampling was conducted between 2018 and 2020 in the Tollense catchment in northeastern Germany and was carried out by in situ pump filtration. Two different sampling systems (cutoff sizes 20 μm and 63 μm) were applied to filter water volumes of 0.075-1.836 m. Retained particles were analyzed by a combination of Nile red staining and micro-Raman spectroscopy. Thereby, we found microplastic concentrations between 123 and 1728 particles m using the 63-μm cut-off size and between 1357 and 2146 particles m using the 20-μm cut-off size. Local hydrodynamics (discharge and flow velocity) and land cover are likely influencing the observed microplastic concentrations and fluxes. The variability between both sampling systems cannot fully be explained by the different mesh sizes used. We argue that differentiation between a theoretical cut-off size (finest mesh) and a factual cut-off size (reliable quantification) can help to understand sampling related differences between studies.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Techniques for Collecting Micro Plastics in Freshwaters and Sediments
This review examined sampling methods used across 150 studies on microplastics in freshwater bodies and sediments, finding significant variation in sampling tools, mesh sizes, and analytical approaches that make it difficult to compare results across studies. Standardizing sampling and analysis protocols is one of the most pressing needs in microplastic research. Without comparable methods, it is difficult to assess the true extent of freshwater microplastic contamination globally.
The assessment of microplastic and microfibres in freshwater systems through different sampling methods reveals causes of incomparability.
Researchers performed a literature mining study on microplastic abundance in freshwater systems, finding that large discrepancies between studies arise not only from inherent environmental variability but from methodological differences in sampling and analytical approaches, highlighting the urgent need for standardized protocols.
Microplastics in freshwater sediment: A review on methods, occurrence, and sources
This review synthesizes methods, occurrence data, and sources of microplastics in freshwater sediments, comparing approaches and providing recommendations for standardized sampling and analysis to fill knowledge gaps relative to marine research.
Development and testing of a fractionated filtration for sampling of microplastics in water
Researchers developed and tested a fractionated filtration system for sampling microplastics in water bodies, proposing a standardized sampling concept that accounts for plastic-specific properties to improve comparability of microplastic data across different studies and environments.
Methods for microplastic sampling and analysis in the seawater and fresh water environment
This review summarized and compared sampling and analysis methods for microplastics in marine and freshwater environments — including trawls, manta nets, pump filtration, FTIR, and Raman spectroscopy — and called for standardization to enable cross-study comparisons of pollution levels.