0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Food & Water Marine & Wildlife Remediation Sign in to save

Organic Matter Sources, Composition, and Quality in Rivers and Experimental Streams

Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University) 2021 1 citation ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 35 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Julia E. Kelso

Summary

This review covers the sources, composition, and quality of organic matter in rivers and streams, examining how human land use changes the chemistry of water bodies. As land is developed, the types of organic compounds entering waterways shift, with implications for ecosystem health. While not focused on microplastics, organic matter dynamics interact with microplastic fate and toxicity in aquatic systems.

Study Type Environmental

Organic matter (OM) is often considered the “currency” for ecosystem processes, such as respiration and primary production. OM in aquatic ecosystems is derived from multiple sources, and is a complex mixture of thousands of different chemical constituents. Therefore, it is difficult to identify all the sources of OM that enter and exit aquatic ecosystems. As humans develop undisturbed land, the rate at which terrestrial OM (e.g.soil and plants) and associated nutrients (e.g.nitrogen) enters rivers has increased. Increased nutrients may lead to increased primary production from aquatic plants and algae, potentially causing eutrophication and harmful algal blooms. In this study, I identified and characterized different sources of OM in four watersheds of Northeastern Utah with multiple land covers such as cities, forests, and crops. I expected OM in watersheds with human-altered land cover would have more OM produced instream by algae and other primary producers, than OM in less disturbed watersheds, which typically have OM from terrestrial sources. I found that OM at river sites with high human impact had high amounts of OM from instream primary production, but there was also OM produced in-steam at sites with low human impact. The greatest differences in OM across watersheds was due to wastewater treatment effluent. I also measured microbial consumption rates of algal derived and terrestrially derived DOM in experimental streams to quantify how much faster algal derived OM was consumed than terrestrial OM. I found algal derived OM was consumed extremely fast, so fast that realistic measurements of its consumption in some river ecosystems may not be possible. It is important to identify and characterize sources of OM to rivers, so watershed manager scan devise effective OM reduction plans appropriate for the constituent of concern unique to that watershed or region. Constituents of concern associated with OM include pathogens affiliated with manure, toxins in harmful algal blooms, metals, and pharmaceuticals from wastewater treatment effluent. Each pollutant requires a unique mitigation strategy and therefore the first step to pollution mitigation is source identification.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Natural organic matter under human‐influenced environments: Implications for future environmental quality research

This review highlighted that anthropogenic materials including microplastics and nanomaterials have become integrated into soil and dissolved organic matter pools, arguing that environmental scientists need new frameworks to distinguish these altered organic matter pools from natural organic matter.

Article Tier 2

Interactions between Microplastics and Dissolved Organic Matter in the Fresh Water Environment

This review explores how microplastics interact with dissolved organic matter (DOM) — the complex mixture of carbon compounds found in rivers and lakes — and what that means for freshwater ecosystems. Microplastics readily bind to DOM, altering its distribution in sediments and affecting the microbial communities that depend on it for food and energy. DOM can also change how far microplastics travel and how available they are to aquatic organisms. The interplay between these two classes of contaminant complicates efforts to predict microplastic behavior in the environment.

Article Tier 2

Microplastic-derived dissolved organic matter and its biogeochemical behaviors in aquatic environments: A review

This review examines how microplastics release dissolved organic matter (MP-DOM) as they break down in water, and how these released chemicals affect water ecosystems. MP-DOM can interact with other pollutants and alter carbon cycling in natural waters, with the type and amount varying based on plastic composition and weathering conditions. Understanding what microplastics release into water as they degrade is important because these dissolved chemicals may have their own toxic effects on aquatic life and water quality.

Article Tier 2

Integrating Aquatic and Terrestrial Perspectives to Improve Insights Into Organic Matter Cycling at the Landscape Scale

This review examines how organic matter moves and breaks down at the interfaces between aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems at the landscape scale. It is a foundational ecology paper with limited direct relevance to microplastics.

Article Tier 2

Managing organic micropollutants in rivers : From monitoring to mitigation

This thesis reviewed how organic micropollutants including pharmaceuticals, pesticides, and industrial chemicals end up in rivers and explored monitoring and treatment strategies for their removal. Understanding micropollutant fate in waterways is related to the broader challenge of microplastics, which can also adsorb and transport these same chemical contaminants.

Share this paper