0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Human Health Effects Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Adverse outcome pathways and in vitro toxicology strategies for microplastics hazard testing

Current Opinion in Toxicology 2021 22 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Sabina Halappanavar, Gary Mallach

Summary

Researchers proposed using the adverse outcome pathway framework to systematically assess microplastic hazards to human health, identifying mechanistic parallels with other well-characterized stressors that can guide prioritization of in vitro testing strategies for particles of different sizes, shapes, and chemistries.

Body Systems
Study Type In vivo

The human health impacts of microplastics exposure remain uncertain, though they are of growing global concern. The strategic use of the adverse outcome pathways (AOPs) framework will permit leveraging of existing knowledge on disease mechanisms of other stressors to improve our understanding of the toxicological impacts of microplastics and enable identification of key biological events within a causal framework linking microplastic exposures to adverse outcomes. Here, the AOP framework is briefly described. Considering that inflammation, oxidative stress and cytotoxicity are among the reported outcomes of microplastics exposure in vitro or in vivo and because these key events form the AOP for tissue injury, an adverse key event preceding tissue dysfunction and disease, the review describes a tiered microplastics testing strategy targeting these events. Minimum considerations for in vitro testing of microplastics are also summarised.

Share this paper