0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Human Health Effects Nanoplastics Sign in to save

In vitro study on the toxicity of nanoplastics with different charges to murine splenic lymphocytes

Journal of Hazardous Materials 2021 115 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Yuqi Li, Mingkai Xu, Zhichun Zhang, Gulinare Halimu, Yongqiang Li, Yansheng Li, Wu Gu, Bowen Zhang, Xiujuan Wang

Summary

Researchers tested how nanoplastics with different surface charges affect immune cells from mouse spleens. They found that positively charged nanoplastics were significantly more toxic, causing greater cell death, more oxidative stress, and stronger inflammatory responses than negatively charged particles. The study suggests that the surface chemistry of nanoplastics plays a critical role in determining their impact on the immune system.

Body Systems
Models
Study Type In vitro

Nanoplastics can be ingested by organisms and penetrate biological barriers to affect multiple physiological functions. However, few studies have focused on the effects of nanoplastics on the mammalian immune system. We evaluated the effects and underlying mechanism of nanoplastics of varying particle sizes and surface charges on murine splenic lymphocytes. We found that nanoplastics penetrated into splenic lymphocytes and that nanoplastics of a diameter of 50 nm were absorbed more efficiently by the cells. The nanoplastics decreased cell viability, induce cell apoptosis, up-regulated apoptosis-related protein expression, elicited the production of reactive oxygen species, altered mitochondrial membrane potential, and impaired mitochondrial function. Positively charged nanoplastics exerted the strongest toxicity. Negatively charged and uncharged nanoplastics caused oxidative stress and mitochondrial structural damage in lymphocytes, while positively charged nanoplastics induced endogenous apoptosis directly. Moreover, nanoplastics inhibited the expression of activated T cell markers on the T cell surface, while inhibiting the differentiation of CD8 T cells and the expression of helper T cell cytokines. In terms of the mechanism, a series of key signaling molecules in the pathways of T cell activation and function were markedly down-regulated after exposure to nanoplastics.

Share this paper