0
Article Tier 2 Human Health Effects Nanoplastics Sign in to save

In vitro study on the toxicity of nanoplastics with different charges to murine splenic lymphocytes

Journal of Hazardous Materials 2021 115 citations

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers tested how nanoplastics with different surface charges affect immune cells from mouse spleens. They found that positively charged nanoplastics were significantly more toxic, causing greater cell death, more oxidative stress, and stronger inflammatory responses than negatively charged particles. The study suggests that the surface chemistry of nanoplastics plays a critical role in determining their impact on the immune system.

Body Systems
Models
Study Type In vitro

Nanoplastics can be ingested by organisms and penetrate biological barriers to affect multiple physiological functions. However, few studies have focused on the effects of nanoplastics on the mammalian immune system. We evaluated the effects and underlying mechanism of nanoplastics of varying particle sizes and surface charges on murine splenic lymphocytes. We found that nanoplastics penetrated into splenic lymphocytes and that nanoplastics of a diameter of 50 nm were absorbed more efficiently by the cells. The nanoplastics decreased cell viability, induce cell apoptosis, up-regulated apoptosis-related protein expression, elicited the production of reactive oxygen species, altered mitochondrial membrane potential, and impaired mitochondrial function. Positively charged nanoplastics exerted the strongest toxicity. Negatively charged and uncharged nanoplastics caused oxidative stress and mitochondrial structural damage in lymphocytes, while positively charged nanoplastics induced endogenous apoptosis directly. Moreover, nanoplastics inhibited the expression of activated T cell markers on the T cell surface, while inhibiting the differentiation of CD8 T cells and the expression of helper T cell cytokines. In terms of the mechanism, a series of key signaling molecules in the pathways of T cell activation and function were markedly down-regulated after exposure to nanoplastics.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Distinct lipid membrane interaction and uptake of differentially charged nanoplastics in bacteria

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers studied how nanoplastics with different surface charges interact with bacterial cell membranes, finding that positively charged particles penetrate bacteria far more effectively than neutral or negatively charged ones. The positively charged nanoplastics caused more cellular stress by generating reactive oxygen species and damaged cell structures differently depending on the bacterial type. These findings are important for understanding how nanoplastics may affect both environmental bacteria and the human microbiome.

Article Tier 2

Surface-Charge-Driven Ferroptosis and Mitochondrial Dysfunction Is Involved in Toxicity Diversity in the Marine Bivalve Exposed to Nanoplastics

AI summary Read the abstract

Scientists exposed clams to both positively and negatively charged nanoplastics and found they cause completely different types of damage. Positively charged particles triggered mitochondrial damage and ferroptosis (a type of cell death involving iron), while negatively charged particles mainly affected the immune system. This matters because real-world nanoplastic pollution contains particles with various surface charges, meaning the health effects may be more complex and varied than single-type exposure studies suggest.

Article Tier 2

Surface Charges of Polystyrene Nanoplastics Affect Their Distribution in Mice

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers administered polystyrene nanoplastics of different sizes and surface charges intravenously to mice and tracked their biodistribution. Negatively charged nanoplastics accumulated more in the liver and spleen, while positively charged particles showed broader tissue distribution, demonstrating that surface charge is a key determinant of where nanoplastics end up in the body.

Article Tier 2

Hazard assessment of nanoplastics is driven by their surface-functionalization. Effects in human-derived primary endothelial cells

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers tested three types of polystyrene nanoplastics with different surface coatings on human blood vessel cells and found that the surface chemistry dramatically affected their toxicity. Positively charged nanoplastics were the most harmful, killing cells, while all types caused DNA damage and oxidative stress. This study shows that as plastics break down in the environment and their surface properties change, their potential to harm the cardiovascular system may change in unpredictable ways.

Article Tier 2

Differentially Charged Nanoplastics Induce Distinct Effects on the Growth and Gut of Benthic Insects (Chironomus kiinensis) via Charge-Specific Accumulation and Perturbation of the Gut Microbiota

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers exposed aquatic insect larvae to positively and negatively charged nanoplastics and found that the surface charge significantly affected how toxic the particles were. Positively charged nanoplastics caused more severe gut damage, greater accumulation in tissues, and bigger disruptions to gut bacteria. This matters because nanoplastics in the real environment carry various charges, and the findings suggest that charge is an important factor in determining health risks.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper