0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

The fiber microparticle pipeline in the marine water column – from source to mitigation strategies

Environmental Advances 2021 8 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 30 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Catherine Tobin, Juanita Urban-Rich

Summary

This review examines the sources, environmental transport, and health implications of microfibers — including synthetic fibers from textiles and natural fibers — in the marine water column. With global fiber production exceeding 100 million metric tons annually, synthetic microfibers are one of the most abundant forms of microplastic in the ocean.

Study Type Environmental

Global fiber production, including both synthetic and natural fibers, has increased dramatically in recent decades. In 2018, global fiber production reached 107 million metric tons (MMT), more than double the fiber production twenty years earlier. Synthetic fibers have begun replacing natural fibers (e.g. cotton, wool, and silk) due to their low price, mass production, and customization. Microfibers (fibers < 5 μm) have typically been discussed in terms of microplastics as they are frequently the most abundant category in microplastic sampling globally. However, recent research has indicated that the ‘microfibers’ found in the environment are not just of plastic descent; rather they can be categorized as natural, semi-synthetic, or synthetic. As a result, ‘microfibers’ cannot solely be categorized as ‘microplastics’, but rather, ‘fiber microparticle (FMP)’ (fibers < 5 μm) to be inclusive of synthetic, semi-synthetic, and natural FMP. FMP are a complex social problem that warrants a transdisciplinary viewpoint. With this perspective in mind, this review paper showcases the state of the science for FMP while also discussing mitigation strategies and data gaps. This review paper focuses solely on fibers found within the marine water column. It does not address FMP in freshwater environments or soil compartments.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Occurrence, sources, fate and transport of textile fibers in oceanic environments

This review covers the occurrence, sources, transport pathways, and environmental fate of synthetic and natural textile fibers in oceanic environments. Despite global fiber production exceeding 107 million tonnes annually, the authors find that natural fibers (cotton, wool) are actually more abundant than synthetic fibers in most environmental samples.

Article Tier 2

Synthetic fibers as microplastics in the marine environment: A review from textile perspective with a focus on domestic washings

This review examined synthetic fibers as a source of microplastics in the marine environment, tracing the full textile lifecycle from manufacturing through use and disposal to understand where and how fibers enter aquatic systems.

Article Tier 2

Review of research on migration, distribution, biological effects, and analytical methods of microfibers in the environment

This review examined the environmental distribution, transport pathways, biological effects, and analytical detection methods for microfibers as the most abundant microplastic form in the environment. Microfibers were found in marine, freshwater, atmospheric, and soil environments globally, and laundry effluent and textile industry wastewater were identified as the dominant emission sources.

Article Tier 2

Research progress on occurrence characteristics and source analysis of microfibers in the marine environment

This review systematically examined the sources of synthetic microfiber pollution in marine environments, covering laundry, fishing gear, industrial textile discharge, and other origins. The authors note that the key sources of marine microfibers remain contested and call for improved source attribution methods.

Article Tier 2

Marine environment microfiber contamination: Global patterns and the diversity of microparticle origins

Researchers collected 1,393 one-liter water grab samples globally and found a mean microparticle concentration of 11.8 particles per liter — roughly 1,000 times higher than model predictions — with 91% being microfibers, 57% synthetic, and highest densities in polar oceans, while also documenting underreported non-synthetic and semi-synthetic fibers from natural textile sources.

Share this paper