0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Marine & Wildlife Reproductive & Development Sign in to save

Chemical cues for intraspecific chemical communication and interspecific interactions in aquatic environments: applications for fisheries and aquaculture

Fisheries Science 2021 50 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 55 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Michiya Kamio, Hidenobu Yambe, Nobuhiro Fusetani

Summary

This review explores how aquatic organisms use chemical cues for communication, mating, feeding, and danger detection, and how this knowledge applies to aquaculture and fisheries. Researchers noted that global environmental changes, including ocean acidification and increasing plastic pollution, can disrupt these chemosensory behaviors. The study discusses practical applications such as using pheromones to improve breeding success and developing low-cost attractants for sustainable fishing.

Body Systems
Study Type Environmental

Abstract Aquatic organisms detect chemical cues to sense the local environment, for example, to find a mate, locate food, and identify danger. Knowledge of chemical cues can be used in aquaculture, in practical applications such as controlling mating behavior to increase fertility, enhance feeding, and decrease stress; in fisheries, by catching selected species with low-cost artificial attractants; and to address maritime issues, by decreasing biofouling. Aquatic organisms also detect chemical cues related to global environmental changes, ocean acidification, and increases in ocean plastics, all of which can affect their chemosensory behaviors. Here we discuss the nature of chemical cues and chemosensory biology and ecology of aquatic organisms, and potential applications with an emphasis on sex pheromones in commercially important and well-studied animals, namely, decapod crustaceans and fish.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Infochemicals Recognized by Crustaceans

This review examines the chemical communication systems of crustaceans, detailing how infochemicals mediate foraging, predator detection, mating, and social hierarchy, and discusses how anthropogenic pollution -- including heavy metals and microplastics -- threatens chemosensory function and thus crustacean ecological fitness.

Article Tier 2

Bioassay complexities—exploring challenges in aquatic chemosensory research

This paper examines the challenges of studying how aquatic organisms detect and respond to chemical signals in their environment. Researchers found that many experimental assumptions, such as whether animals are ready to respond or have already been exposed to test cues, introduce significant variability into study results. The study suggests that the field needs better standardized methods to produce reliable and comparable findings across different laboratories.

Article Tier 2

Role of Environmental Pollution in Altering Reproductive Cycles in Freshwater Fishes

Not relevant to microplastics — this review examines how industrial chemicals, pharmaceuticals, heavy metals, and pesticides in freshwater ecosystems disrupt reproductive cycles in fish, covering hormonal imbalances and population effects from endocrine-disrupting chemicals broadly.

Article Tier 2

Plastic waste interferes with chemical communication in aquatic ecosystems

Researchers found that plastic waste made of common polymers like HDPE and PET can absorb chemical signals that water fleas (Daphnia) use to detect predators, disrupting their ability to form protective physical defenses. This indirect effect of microplastics — interfering with chemical communication rather than causing direct toxicity — could have far-reaching consequences for aquatic food webs.

Article Tier 2

Interference of Chemical Communication in Plankton: Impact of Nanoplastics

This review explains how nanoplastics — plastic fragments smaller than 1,000 nanometers — physically interfere with the chemical signals that aquatic plankton use to find mates, detect predators, and compete for food, effectively silencing the invisible communication networks that underpin freshwater food webs. Because plankton form the base of aquatic ecosystems, disrupting these chemical cues can cascade upward through food chains, reducing biodiversity and destabilizing ecosystems even at nanoplastic concentrations too low to cause obvious physical harm.

Share this paper