We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
A comparison of spectroscopic analysis methods for microplastics: Manual, semi-automated, and automated Fourier transform infrared and Raman techniques
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers compared manual, semi-automated, and fully automated methods for identifying microplastics using FTIR and Raman spectroscopy. They found that the semi-automated approach was the best balance of accuracy and efficiency, detecting 22% more microplastic particles than manual analysis while taking less time. The fully automated method was fastest but had an 80% false positive rate, while Raman microscopy was better for very small particles but took nine times longer.
This study was conducted to establish the best practice for microplastic analysis by reducing the time demand and human bias and comparing the characteristics of μ-FTIR and Raman techniques. A manual analysis, semi-automated method, and fully automatic identification method were compared. Fully automated identification took the shortest time to analyze a whole filter paper (Ø25 mm), but its false positive identification rate was 80 ± 15%. The semi-automated analysis using spectrum profiling was suitable for all aspects of microplastic analysis. It was less time consuming than the manual analysis (manual: 6.1 ± 0.8 h, semi-automated: 4.0 ± 0.6 h), and 22 ± 12% more microplastic particles were detected using the semi-automated method compared to the manual analysis due to the reduction in false negative results. Raman microscopy was suitable for small microplastic (>5 μm) identification, although the Raman analysis took nine times longer than the semi-automated analysis.
More Papers Like This
Development of a novel semi-automated analytical system of microplastics using reflectance-FTIR spectrometry: designed for the analysis of large microplastics
AI summary Read the abstract
A semi-automated reflectance-FTIR spectrometry system was developed for microplastic analysis, designed specifically for large microplastics and capable of dramatically accelerating the otherwise labor-intensive identification process while maintaining accuracy in polymer type determination.
Comparing Raman and FTIR Spectroscopy for the Quantification of Microplastics
AI summary Read the abstract
This study compared Raman and FTIR spectroscopy for quantifying microplastics in environmental samples, evaluating the accuracy, sensitivity, and practicality of each technique. Both methods can identify and quantify microplastics, but differ in throughput, detection limits, and suitability for different polymer types and sample matrices.
Identification methods in microplastic analysis: a review
AI summary Read the abstract
This review compared identification methods used in microplastic analysis — including visual inspection, FTIR, Raman spectroscopy, and thermal analysis — evaluating their accuracy, throughput, and suitability for different sample types.
Robust Automatic Identification of Microplastics in Environmental Samples Using FTIR Microscopy
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers developed a robust automated method for identifying microplastics in environmental samples using FTIR microscopy combined with machine learning-based spectral matching, improving the consistency and efficiency of microplastic identification compared to manual evaluation.
Development of a rapid detection protocol for microplastics using reflectance-FTIR spectroscopic imaging and multivariate classification
AI summary Read the abstract
Reflectance-FTIR spectroscopy was evaluated as a faster and more automated detection method for microplastics in environmental samples, with results showing strong potential for high-throughput screening. The method could reduce the time and cost of routine microplastic monitoring programs.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.