0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Assessing microplastic exposure of large marine filter-feeders

The Science of The Total Environment 2021 61 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 55 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Thijs Bosker, Thijs Bosker, Laura J. Zantis, Sarah E. Nelms Laura J. Zantis, Thijs Bosker, Laura J. Zantis, Sarah E. Nelms Laura J. Zantis, Laura J. Zantis, Laura J. Zantis, Laura J. Zantis, Thijs Bosker, Laura J. Zantis, Thijs Bosker, Laura J. Zantis, Laura J. Zantis, Sarah E. Nelms Sarah E. Nelms Sarah E. Nelms Sarah E. Nelms Sarah E. Nelms Laura J. Zantis, Sarah E. Nelms Thijs Bosker, Thijs Bosker, Thijs Bosker, Thijs Bosker, Laura J. Zantis, Emma L. Carroll, Mary A. Sewell, Thijs Bosker, Laura J. Zantis, Thijs Bosker, Sarah E. Nelms F. Lawler, Thijs Bosker, Thijs Bosker, Sarah E. Nelms Thijs Bosker, Thijs Bosker, Thijs Bosker, Thijs Bosker, Thijs Bosker, Thijs Bosker, Thijs Bosker, Emma L. Carroll, Thijs Bosker, Richard O’Rorke, Thijs Bosker, Thijs Bosker, Thijs Bosker, Thijs Bosker, Thijs Bosker, Thijs Bosker, Thijs Bosker, Rochelle Constantine, Sarah E. Nelms Thijs Bosker, Laura J. Zantis, Sarah E. Nelms Sarah E. Nelms Thijs Bosker, Thijs Bosker, Thijs Bosker, Thijs Bosker, Laura J. Zantis, Thijs Bosker, Laura J. Zantis, Laura J. Zantis, Thijs Bosker, Thijs Bosker, Mary A. Sewell, Emma L. Carroll, Thijs Bosker, Sarah E. Nelms Sarah E. Nelms Thijs Bosker, Thijs Bosker, Thijs Bosker, Thijs Bosker, Thijs Bosker, Sarah E. Nelms Sarah E. Nelms Sarah E. Nelms Sarah E. Nelms Thijs Bosker, Thijs Bosker, Laura J. Zantis, Sarah E. Nelms Sarah E. Nelms

Summary

Researchers analyzed whale scat to estimate microplastic exposure in baleen whales feeding in coastal New Zealand waters. Using stochastic simulation modeling, they estimated whales ingest over 3.4 million microplastics per day, a figure four orders of magnitude higher than would be predicted from surface water measurements alone. The study suggests that trophic transfer through prey is the dominant exposure route for large filter-feeding marine animals, not direct environmental ingestion.

Large filter-feeding animals are potential sentinels for understanding the extent of microplastic pollution, as their mode of foraging and prey mean they are continuously sampling the environment. However, there is considerable uncertainty about the total and mode of exposure (environmental vs trophic). Here, we explore microplastic exposure and ingestion by baleen whales feeding year-round in coastal Auckland waters, New Zealand. Plastic and DNA were extracted concurrently from whale scat, with 32 ± 24 (mean ± SD, n = 21) microplastics per 6 g scat sample detected. Using a novel stochastic simulation modeling incorporating new and previously published DNA diet information, we extrapolate this to total microplastic exposure levels of 24,028 (95% CI: 2119, 69,270) microplastics per mouthful of prey, or 3,408,002 microplastics (95% CI: 295,810, 10,031,370) per day, substantially higher than previous estimates for large filter-feeding animals. Critically, we find that the total exposure is four orders of magnitude more than expected from microplastic measurements of local coastal surface waters. This suggests that trophic transfer, rather than environmental exposure, is the predominant mode of exposure of large filter feeders for microplastic pollution. Measuring plastic concentration from the environment alone significantly underestimates exposure levels, an important consideration for future risk assessment studies.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper