We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Microplastics and road markings: the role of glass beads and loss estimation
AI summary Read the abstract
Field and laboratory assessment of road marking wear found that retroreflectivity failures cause markings to be renewed before plastic-bearing paint layers are significantly abraded, resulting in microplastic emissions of only 0.1 to 4.3 g/person/year at most locations -- far below previously reported estimates.
Road markings are often listed amongst meaningful contributors to pollution with microplastics. However, the reported estimates do not address the renewal frequency and its association with the key parameter of road markings – retroreflectivity. This parameter, achieved because of a layer of glass beads on the road markings surface, fails before the plastic-bearing layer could be abraded. Field and laboratory assessment indicated the presence of several layers of paint and glass beads, confirming that the road markings were renewed before abrasion could occur. A methodology to employ luminance histograms to estimate loss of road markings was developed and used to approximate the emissions at selected exemplary locations. The estimates indicated that road marking loss at the most used areas of pedestrian crossings was below 6%, which is much less than previously reported. Thus, the emissions of microplastics of any dimension from this source were calculated to be between 0.1 and 4.3 g/person/year (except in Nordic countries, where 56.3 g/person/year could be reached). Consequently, road markings do not appear to be as significant source of microplastic pollution as was reported before, except for specific local considerations.
More Papers Like This
Microplastics from road markings: the loss of drop-on glass beads as a signal of emissions
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers investigated microplastic emissions from road marking abrasion under controlled laboratory conditions, finding that glass beads applied to road marking surfaces play a protective role that reduces MP loss in field conditions, with results quantifying drop-on bead loss as a signal of emission rates.
Environmental transport and sorting of glass retroreflective microbeads and their potential as proxies for road marking paints
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers analyzed the concentration, sorting, and transport of glass retroreflective microbeads used in road marking paints across environmental samples, testing their potential as proxies for road paint microplastic emissions. Retroreflective microbeads were found in environmental samples and showed transport patterns consistent with being road-marking-derived, providing a novel tracer for this undercharacterized source of road-associated microplastic pollution.
Erosion of road markings in Croatia and estimate of contribution to microplastic pollution
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers quantified the erosion of road markings across Croatia to estimate their contribution to microplastic pollution. By surveying markings of various types and ages, they found measurable losses of material that translate into significant microplastic emissions over time. The study suggests that road marking wear is an overlooked but meaningful source of microplastic contamination in the environment.
Microplastics from road markings in the presence of tyre wear – a laboratory test method development
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers developed an analytical procedure combining a temperature gradient method and ICP-OES to distinguish road marking wear from tyre wear particles, validating it on a wear simulator and finding that glass beads in road markings act protectively, delaying microplastic release, and that emissions vary enormously across different road marking materials.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.