0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Nanoplastics Remediation Sign in to save

Microplastics and nanoplastics: Recent literature studies and patents on their removal from aqueous environment

The Science of The Total Environment 2021 120 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 60 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Muhammad Adli Hanif, Muhammad Adli Hanif, Muhammad Adli Hanif, Muhammad Adli Hanif, Muhammad Adli Hanif, Muhammad Adli Hanif, Naimah Ibrahim, Naimah Ibrahim, Naimah Ibrahim, Naimah Ibrahim, Aishah Abdul Jalil Aishah Abdul Jalil Naimah Ibrahim, Farrah Aini Dahalan, Aishah Abdul Jalil Naimah Ibrahim, Farrah Aini Dahalan, Muhammad Adli Hanif, Farrah Aini Dahalan, Farrah Aini Dahalan, Farrah Aini Dahalan, Masitah Hasan, Umi Fazara Md Ali, Umi Fazara Md Ali, Umi Fazara Md Ali, Umi Fazara Md Ali, Masitah Hasan, Aishah Abdul Jalil Farrah Aini Dahalan, Masitah Hasan, Masitah Hasan, Farrah Aini Dahalan, Aishah Abdul Jalil Umi Fazara Md Ali, Aishah Abdul Jalil Aishah Abdul Jalil Masitah Hasan, Naimah Ibrahim, Aishah Abdul Jalil Aishah Abdul Jalil Naimah Ibrahim, Aishah Abdul Jalil

Summary

This review surveyed recent research and 42 international patents on technologies for removing microplastics and nanoplastics from water, categorizing methods into filtration, capture-based, and degradation approaches. Removal efficiencies between 58% and 100% were reported across techniques including coagulation, membrane filtration, photocatalytic degradation, and microbial breakdown. The study highlights that while promising methods exist, each has limitations depending on factors like plastic type, water chemistry, and particle size.

The presence of microplastics (MP) and nanoplastics (NP) in the environment poses significant hazards towards microorganisms, humans, animals and plants. This paper is focused on recent literature studies and patents discussing the removal process of these plastic pollutants. Microplastics and nanoplastics can be quantified by counting, weighing, absorbance and turbidity and can be further analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), dynamic light scattering (DLS), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), Raman spectroscopy, surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy and Raman tweezers. Mitigation methods reported are categorized depending on the removal characteristics: (i) Filtration and separation method: Filtration and separation, electrospun nanofiber membrane, constructed wetlands; (ii) Capture and surface attachment method: coagulation, flocculation and sedimentation (CFS), electrocoagulation, adsorption, magnetization, micromachines, superhydrophobic materials and microorganism aggregation; and (iii) Degradation method: photocatalytic degradation, microorganism degradation and thermal degradation; where removal efficiency between 58 and 100% were reported. As these methods are significantly distinctive, the parameters which affect the MP/NP removal performance e.g., pH, type of plastics, presence of interfering chemicals or ions, surface charges etc. are also discussed. 42 granted international patents related to microplastics and nanoplastics removal are also reviewed where the majority of these patents are focused on separation or filtration devices. These devices are efficient for microplastics up to 20 μm but may be ineffective for nanoplastics or fibrous plastics. Several patents were found to focus on methods similar to literature studies e.g., magnetization, CFS, biofilm and microorganism aggregation; with the addition of another method: thermal degradation.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper