We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Affects in Online Stakeholder Engagement: A Dissensus Perspective
Summary
This study challenges the assumption that online stakeholder engagement produces rational consensus, arguing instead that conflict and emotional 'affects' are fundamental drivers of discourse around corporate responsibility for plastic pollution.
A predominant assumption in studies of deliberative democracy is that stakeholder engagements will lead to rational consensus and to a common discourse on corporate social and environmental responsibilities. Challenging this assumption, we show that conflict is ineradicable and important and that affects constitute the dynamics of change of the discourses of responsibilities. On the basis of an analysis of social media engagements in the context of the grand challenge of plastic pollution, we argue that civil society actors use mobilization strategies with their peers and inclusive-dissensus strategies with corporations to convert them to a new discourse. These strategies use moral affects to blame and shame corporations and solidarity affects to create feelings of identification with the group and to avoid disengagement and polarization. Our research contributes to the literature on deliberative democracy and stakeholder engagement in social media in the collective constructions of discourses on grand challenges.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
From analytical to empathetic: Disruptive communication for action-based decision-making
Researchers examined how disruptive communication approaches can be shifted from purely analytical to empathetic framing to better drive engagement and action-based decision-making around plastic pollution. The study found that combining emotional resonance with concrete action pathways makes disruptive communication more effective at motivating behavioral and policy change.
Engaging in Online Environmental Discussion: Experiences and Reflections of Students in an Undergraduate Science Course
This paper reported on students' experiences and reflections from engaging in online discussions about environmental issues including plastic pollution, examining how digital forums shape environmental learning and attitude formation. Students developed more nuanced understanding of environmental problems through peer discussion.
From analytical to empathetic: Disruptive communication for action-based decision-making
This study examined how disruptive communication strategies can more effectively engage diverse audiences around plastic pollution and translate awareness into concrete action and policy decisions. The research found that empathetic framing combined with actionable guidance improves the impact of disruptive communication beyond emotional provocation alone.
Toward a Taxonomy of Climate Emotions
This literature review proposes a preliminary taxonomy of climate emotions, categorizing emotional responses to the climate crisis into distinct types that influence resilience, climate action, and psychological well-being. The research argues that understanding the full range of climate emotions, from anxiety and grief to hope and determination, is essential for effective climate communication and action. Climate change and plastic pollution share emotional and behavioral dimensions, as both are driven by consumption patterns and require systemic behavioral change.
Global perceptions of plastic pollution: The contours and limits of debate
This review analyzed 39 peer-reviewed studies on public perceptions of plastic pollution, finding that research discourse is narrowly focused on marine impacts and single-use plastics while largely ignoring broader plastic pollution contexts relevant to international treaty negotiations.