0
Article Tier 2 Detection Methods Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Remediation Sign in to save

Sediment Trap Development and Quantification of Microplastics Deposition in the Black and Waccamaw River Systems, South Carolina

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers developed cost-efficient sediment traps to measure microplastic deposition in two South Carolina river systems — one in a high-population watershed and one in a low-population watershed. Results showed higher microplastic deposition in the more urbanised watershed, linking population density and land use to microplastic pollution in river sediments.

Study Type Environmental

Plastic pollution is a growing environmental concern because of the widespread and toxic damage it can have on ecosystems and the organisms that inhabit them. Microplastics are small plastic particles produced from the degradation of larger plastic items. To better understand the impact of land use on microplastic concentrations in coastal South Carolina rivers, sampling stations were established in a high population density watershed (Waccamaw River) and a low population density watershed (Black River). Two cost-efficient sediment traps were designed; a sediment tile with a koi pond filter attached to a ceramic tile and a pipe cradle installed vertically near the river bottom. Each trap design was deployed in two-month rotations at the two sampling locations, one in the Waccamaw River and one at the Black River. Once collected, the samples were washed, and plastics were separated by density using a 30% calcium chloride solution of density 1.30-1.35 g/ml. Microplastics were removed from the dried samples under a microscope using forceps, counted, and stored in glass vials. To compare sites, microplastic counts were normalized to the number of days the trap was deployed. For the Black River (low population density site), an average of 2.01 plastics/day were found compared to the Waccamaw River (high population density site) average of 2.37 plastics/day. An independent samples t-test found these averages are not statistically significantly different (p = 0.340). It is possible a difference was not detected because of the small number of samples collected; additional samples could result in a significant difference between the observed number of plastics in both rivers. The results of this research will strengthen proper collection methods for microplastics and contribute to the understanding of the dynamics of microplastic deposition in coastal watersheds.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Population density and agricultural land cover influence microplastic concentrations in river sediments

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers measured microplastic concentrations in river sediments across nine Mid-Atlantic US watersheds and compared findings from 18 countries, finding no consistent longitudinal trend from headwaters to downstream reaches, but identifying population density and agricultural land cover as significant positive predictors of MP accumulation at a global scale.

Article Tier 2

Microplastic distribution and characteristics across a large river basin: Insights from the Neuse River in North Carolina, USA

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers characterized microplastic distribution across the Neuse River Basin in North Carolina, finding microplastics in both water and sediment at all sampling locations, with concentrations influenced by land use and proximity to urban areas.

Article Tier 2

Fluvial Concentrations of Microplastics in a Suburban Micro-Watershed: Sampling Methodology and Analysis

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers designed a low-cost sampling station to collect and quantify microplastics in a shallow suburban stream in South Carolina. They found that microplastic abundance increased from the top of the watershed to the bottom, rising from about 269 to 715 particles per 10 cubic meters of surface water. Fibers were the dominant type, and the study highlights the need for standardized sampling methods for small freshwater streams.

Article

Quantifying Riverine Plastic Pollution Using Participatory Science and Trash Traps

AI summary Read the abstract

This study demonstrated the utility of in-stream trash traps operated by Waterkeeper organizations in North Carolina for quantifying riverine plastic pollution, documenting 150,750 captured litter items between 2021 and 2024. Plastic accumulation rates were positively correlated with impervious surface cover, road density, and in some traps, precipitation rates, providing insights into key drivers of riverine litter.

Article Tier 2

Concentration, transportation, and deposition of microplastics along the Savannah River, Georgia (USA).

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers studied microplastic concentrations and transport along the Savannah River in the southeastern USA, finding spatial variations linked to industrial and agricultural land use. The study documents how a variably developed fluvial system accumulates and transports microplastics toward the ocean.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper