0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Sign in to save

Are cosmetics a significant source of PFAS in Europe? product inventories, chemical characterization and emission estimates

Environmental Science Processes & Impacts 2022 48 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 45 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Kerstin Winkens Pütz, Merle Plassmann, Shahla Namazkar, Merle Plassmann, Merle Plassmann, Merle Plassmann, Merle Plassmann, Merle Plassmann, Merle Plassmann, Merle Plassmann, Jonathan P. Benskin Merle Plassmann, Jonathan P. Benskin Merle Plassmann, Merle Plassmann, Merle Plassmann, Jonathan P. Benskin Jonathan P. Benskin Jonathan P. Benskin Jonathan P. Benskin Jonathan P. Benskin Jonathan P. Benskin Jonathan P. Benskin Jonathan P. Benskin Merle Plassmann, Jonathan P. Benskin

Summary

Analysis of the European cosmetics ingredient database identified approximately 170 per- and polyfluoroalkyl substance structures used in cosmetics in the European Economic Area, providing the first estimate of PFAS emissions from cosmetics use in the region.

Polymers
Study Type Environmental

In this study, emission of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) from the use of cosmetics in the European Economic Area (EEA; not including Lichtenstein and Iceland) was estimated for the first time. Using the European Commission database for information on cosmetic substances and ingredients (CosIng) ∼170 structures containing at least -CF<sub>2</sub>- or -CF<sub>3</sub> were identified as ingredients in cosmetics on the European market. These structures were then cross referenced against the Cosmetic Database "CosmEthics" to identify PFAS-containing products. Among these products, polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) and C9-15 fluoroalcohol phosphate were the most frequently listed PFAS ingredients. Thereafter, a sample of 45 cosmetics spanning 5 product categories was purchased in Sweden and characterized for total fluorine (TF), extractable organofluorine (EOF), and target PFAS. Using measured concentrations, the share of PFAS-containing products in each product category, sales data from Cosmetics Europe, as well as other parameters and assumptions, the annual emission of PFAS from cosmetics after use was estimated. Annual EEA-wide TF and EOF-based emissions ranged from ∼17-38 000 kg F per year and 37-5100 kg F per year, respectively, representing combined emission to wastewater and solid waste (low to high emission scenario). Sum perfluoroalkyl carboxylic acid (PFCA) emissions were considerably lower (21 kg ∑PFCAs per year; high scenario). While TF- and EOF-based emissions are significant, they are considerably lower than estimates of TF emission from washing of PFAS-coated textiles in the EU. This work provides the first estimate of PFAS emissions from cosmetics and highlights the importance of using a multi-platform analytical approach for PFAS emission estimates.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper