0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Sign in to save

From properties to toxicity: Comparing microplastics to other airborne microparticles

Journal of Hazardous Materials 2022 125 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 60 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Christian Laforsch Simon Wieland, Christian Laforsch Aylin Balmes, Simon Wieland, Simon Wieland, Simon Wieland, Christian Laforsch Christian Laforsch Christian Laforsch Christian Laforsch Christian Laforsch Christian Laforsch Christian Laforsch Julian Bender, Christian Laforsch Christian Laforsch Christian Laforsch Christian Laforsch Simon Wieland, Jonas Kitzinger, Christian Laforsch Christian Laforsch Felix Meyer, Holger Kress, Holger Kress, Holger Kress, Christian Laforsch Christian Laforsch Christian Laforsch Christian Laforsch Christian Laforsch Anja FRM Ramsperger, Christian Laforsch Christian Laforsch Christian Laforsch Christian Laforsch Franz Roeder, Holger Kress, Caroline Tengelmann, Christian Laforsch Holger Kress, Christian Laforsch Christian Laforsch Christian Laforsch Christian Laforsch Christian Laforsch Christian Laforsch Christian Laforsch Christian Laforsch Benedikt H. Wimmer, Christian Laforsch Christian Laforsch Christian Laforsch Holger Kress, Christian Laforsch Christian Laforsch Christian Laforsch

Summary

This study compared airborne microplastics to other well-studied airborne particles like asbestos, silica, soot, and cotton dust to better understand potential health risks from inhaling plastic particles. Researchers examined how properties such as size, shape, surface charge, and durability drive toxicity across these different particle types. The comparison provides a framework for understanding microplastic inhalation risks, which remain poorly studied despite growing evidence of atmospheric plastic pollution.

Body Systems

Microplastic (MP) debris is considered as a potentially hazardous material. It is omnipresent in our environment, and evidence that MP is also abundant in the atmosphere is increasing. Consequently, the inhalation of these particles is a significant exposure route to humans. Concerns about potential effects of airborne MP on human health are rising. However, currently, there are not enough studies on the putative toxicity of airborne MP to adequately assess its impact on human health. Therefore, we examined potential drivers of airborne MP toxicity. Physicochemical properties like size, shape, ζ-potential, adsorbed molecules and pathogens, and the MP's bio-persistence have been proposed as possible drivers of MP toxicity. Since their role in MP toxicity is largely unknown, we reviewed the literature on toxicologically well-studied non-plastic airborne microparticles (asbestos, silica, soot, wood, cotton, hay). We aimed to link the observed health effects and toxicology of these microparticles to the abovementioned properties. By comparing this information with studies on the effects of airborne MP, we analyzed possible mechanisms of airborne MP toxicity. Thus, we provide a basis for a mechanistic understanding of airborne MP toxicity. This may enable the assessment of risks associated with airborne MP pollution, facilitating effective policymaking and product design.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper