We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Less impact than suspected: Dietary exposure of three-spined sticklebacks to microplastic fibers does not affect their body condition and immune parameters
Summary
Researchers found that dietary exposure to polyester microplastic fibers at environmentally relevant and elevated concentrations had no significant effects on growth, body condition, or immune parameters of three-spined sticklebacks over nine weeks.
Microplastic fibers are frequent anthropogenic contaminants in most aquatic environments and have consequently been detected in the digestive tract of many fish species. Upon ingestion, microplastic fibers pose risks of interference with nutrient uptake, impaired intestinal health, and as a consequence may alter growth performance and fitness. In addition, foreign particles such as fibers might cause tissue irritations and stress, and thus interfere with immune parameters. In nature, fish regularly encounter microplastic fibers as well as fiber debris from natural sources and materials. Thus, we wanted to test the potential impact of microplastic fibers on growth, organosomatic indices, and immune parameters of subadult fish and compare these to possible effects caused by natural fibers. We administered sticklebacks diets, which were supplemented with either polyester or cotton fibers (each at concentrations of 0.2 mg/g and 2 mg/g feed) or a control diet without fiber supplementation for nine weeks. Mortalities did not occur and sticklebacks grew equally well across treatments. Neither organosomatic indices nor immune parameters revealed significant differences between treatments. While natural differences between males and females were observed for some parameters, no treatment-related gender-specific effects were detected. Our results suggest that the dietary uptake of polyester fibers does not affect growth, body condition, gonad development, and immunity of sticklebacks - even at fiber concentrations higher than what can be encountered in the wild. Furthermore, virgin microplastic fibers do not seem to affect fish differently than fibers from natural origin. The present study implies that at least some species are resilient towards pollution with (virgin) microplastic fibers even at high concentrations.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Exposure to microplastic fibers does not change fish early life stage development of three-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus)
Exposure of three-spined stickleback eggs and larvae to microplastic fibers at environmentally relevant concentrations had no significant effect on fertilization success, hatching rates, embryonic survival, or early larval development, suggesting that microplastic fibers alone may not impair early life stages of this species under realistic conditions.
Short-term microplastic exposure fails to affect swimming endurance or body condition in juvenile golden shiners Notemigonus crysoleucas
A 15-day experiment exposing juvenile golden shiners to nylon fibers, PET fragments, polypropylene fibers, and polystyrene spheres found no significant effects on swimming endurance or body condition, suggesting short-term microplastic exposure may not impair locomotor performance in this freshwater fish species.
No Effect of Realistic Concentrations of Polyester Microplastic Fibers on Freshwater Zooplankton Communities
Researchers tested whether realistic concentrations of polyester microplastic fibers affect freshwater zooplankton communities in experimental settings. The study found no significant effects on zooplankton abundance, diversity, or community structure at environmentally relevant concentrations, suggesting that current levels of fiber pollution may not substantially impact these organisms.
Microplastic vector effects: are fish at risk when exposed via the trophic chain?
Researchers exposed three-spined sticklebacks to polyethylene microplastics via food chain transfer (prey ingestion) for one month and measured biochemical and molecular effects. While the microplastics were transferred through the trophic chain, chemical toxicity was not amplified, suggesting that trophic transfer alone may not substantially increase the chemical risk from microplastics in this species.
Do foodborne polyethylene microparticles affect the health of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)?
Researchers fed rainbow trout diets containing polyethylene microparticles at three concentrations for six weeks and evaluated various health indicators including growth, organ condition, blood chemistry, and gut histology. The study found that pristine polyethylene microparticles at environmentally relevant concentrations did not cause significant adverse health effects in the fish over the exposure period.