0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Remediation Sign in to save

Microplastics alter feeding strategies of a coral reef organism

Limnology and Oceanography Letters 2022 19 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 35 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Marlena Joppien, Marlena Joppien, Hildegard Westphal, Hildegard Westphal, Hildegard Westphal, Hildegard Westphal, Marleen Stuhr, Marleen Stuhr, Steve S. Doo Steve S. Doo

Summary

Researchers investigated how microplastics alter the feeding behavior of large benthic foraminifera Amphistegina gibbosa by offering pristine and conditioned microplastic particles alongside live Artemia nauplii in controlled incubation experiments. They found that organisms selectively avoided pristine microplastics but interacted with conditioned microplastics at rates similar to prey, suggesting that environmental aging and biofilm formation on microplastics increases their ecological impact.

Abstract Increasing marine microplastic pollution has detrimentally impacted organismal physiology and ecosystem functioning. While previous studies document negative effects of microplastics on coral reef animals, the potential responses of organisms such as large benthic foraminifera (LBF) are largely unknown. Here, we document the impact of microplastics on heterotrophic feeding behavior of LBF. Specimens of Amphistegina gibbosa were incubated in three experimental treatments: (1) Artemia sp. nauplii only; (2) pristine microplastic particles only; and (3) choice of nauplii and pristine microplastic. Feeding responses were evaluated 24 h after initiation of treatments. A separate experiment was conducted to compare the effect of conditioned vs. pristine microplastic. Our results indicate that A. gibbosa is able to selectively feed on Artemia , avoiding interactions with pristine microplastic. However, the presence of conditioned microplastic causes similar feeding interaction rates as with Artemia . This suggests that microplastics with longer residence times may have a larger impact on facultative detritivores.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper