0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Face masks as environmental risk: An observational study using street - Survey in Hisar District of Haryana State

Ecology Environment and Conservation 2022 1 citation ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 35 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Dinesh Kumar, Sukesh Trikha, Ranju Anthony, Reena Pathania

Summary

Researchers conducted an observational field survey of littered face masks in 10 localities across Hisar District, Haryana, India, quantifying the density of discarded personal protective equipment during the COVID-19 pandemic. They found an overall density of 0.81 masks per 100 square meters, with 52% being single-use surgical masks containing plastic, highlighting improper disposal as a growing source of plastic pollution in developing countries.

The present pandemic has increased especially the single use plastic waste across globe and the developing countries might find it hard to dispose them safely. The use of single use plastic Personal Protective Equipments (PPE), especially the face mask, as a result of universal masking, has increased manifold. The researchers conducted a study, using 'observation' as a tool to gauge the quantity of littered facemasks, at specific locations in District Hisar, Haryana, India. Two rural and two urban localities were chosen. Density of facemasks per unit area was measured to quantify the problem. Out of total 1063 littered discarded facemasks across 10 localities in district Hisar, 52 percent were surgical facemasks which contain a considerable amount of plastic. Overall, density of littered facemasks was found to be 0.81 masks per 100 square meters. Reusable cloth masks also contain variety of non biodegradable materials which pose serious risks to the environment. Littered facemasks are potential biomedical waste which may pose challenges to human environment if not disposed of properly. The ecosystem, humans, flora and fauna of the earth, all are being affected by the huge amount of single use plastic waste. The safe disposal of such waste is the need of the hour and should be tackled earnestly employing inter agency coordination.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

A Descriptive Analytical Study to Assess the Knowledge and Practice of Proper Face Mask Wearing among Healthcare Professionals, Patients and Attendants in a Tertiary Care Center of North India

Researchers conducted a descriptive study assessing healthcare workers' knowledge and practice of proper face mask disposal during and after the COVID-19 pandemic, finding widespread improper disposal practices including littering and mixing with general waste. The study identifies training gaps and recommends clearer disposal guidelines to prevent face masks from entering the environment as a microplastic source.

Article Tier 2

Microplastics from face masks: A potential hazard post Covid-19 pandemic

Researchers quantified the annual face mask usage and associated plastic waste across 36 countries during the COVID-19 pandemic, estimating total annual mask usage exceeding 1.5 million tonnes and associated plastic waste of approximately 4.2 million tonnes. The study highlights that global COVID-19 responses substantially increased environmental microplastic burdens from single-use face mask disposal.

Article Tier 2

Disposal Behavior of Used Masks during the COVID-19 Pandemic in the Moroccan Community: Potential Environmental Impact

Researchers surveyed face mask disposal behavior in two major Moroccan regions during the COVID-19 pandemic and estimated the volume of mask waste generated. They found that over five million masks per day, equivalent to roughly 40,000 kg, were being discarded in the studied regions alone. The study highlights the significant environmental risk posed by pandemic-related plastic waste, which can break down into microplastics in both land and marine environments.

Article Tier 2

Face masks: a COVID-19 protector or environmental contaminant?

This review examined how the massive global use of disposable face masks during COVID-19 has created a significant source of microplastic pollution, with billions of masks entering the environment and releasing plastic fibers and chemical contaminants.

Article Tier 2

Disseminating the Biomedical Waste Generation Scenario During Covid-19: an Overview from the Lower Middle Income Country Bangladesh

This study quantified biomedical waste generated during the COVID-19 pandemic in Bangladesh, estimating that about 158 million face masks were disposed of in urban areas alone during the study period, generating 517 tons of solid waste. Pandemic-related medical waste adds a significant burden of plastic pollution, including microplastic-shedding personal protective equipment.

Share this paper