0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Sign in to save

ArcticNet 2021 Annual Scientific Meeting Abstracts

Arctic Science 2022 2 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 25 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Stephanie Wright, Jrmie Bonneau, Stephanie Wright, Stephanie Wright, Stephanie Wright, Stephanie Wright, Stephanie Wright, Stephanie Wright, Stephanie Wright, Stephanie Wright, Stephanie Wright, Stephanie Wright, Stephanie Wright, Stephanie Wright, Stephanie Wright, Stephanie Wright, Stephanie Wright, Stephanie Wright, Stephanie Wright, Bernard Laval, Stephanie Wright, Stephanie Wright, Stephanie Wright, Derek Mueller, Stephanie Wright, Stephanie Wright, Stephanie Wright, Andrew Hamilton, Stephanie Wright, Stephanie Wright, Stephanie Wright, Stephanie Wright, Stephanie Wright, Stephanie Wright, Stephanie Wright, Stephanie Wright, Stephanie Wright, Samuel Gagnon, Stephanie Wright, Stephanie Wright, Stephanie Wright, Daniel Fortier, David Babb, Stephanie Wright, Stephanie Wright, Stephanie Wright, Stephanie Wright, Stephanie Wright, Stephanie Wright, Sergei Kirillov, Ryan Galley, Fiamma Straneao, Jens Ehn, Stephen Howell, Mike Brady, Stephanie Wright, Natasha Ridenour, Stephanie Wright, David Barber, Brit Myers, Lisa Guy, Janet Warburton, Kuba Grzeda, Elizabeth Turner-Borgren, Stephanie Wright, Martha Rynolds, Helga Bltmann, Shawnee Kasanke, Donald Walker, William Quinton, Stephanie Wright, Shaghayegh Akbarpour, Maude Auclair, Olivia Carpino, Dieter Cazon, Laura Chasmer, Kristen Coleman, Ryan Connon, James Craig, Stephanie Wright, Jens Ehn, Isabelle De Grandpr, lise Devoie, Mason Dominico, Seamus Daly, Ramona Pearson, Lorna Harris, Kristine Haynes, Christopher Hopkinson, Deanna Jumbo, Steven Kikelj, Jennifer Korosi, David Olefeldt, Arial Sanguez, Miguel Sioui, Mahkameh Taheri, Lauren Thompson, Stephanie Wright, Casey Beel, Shannon Christoffersen, Kara Matthews, Jacob Huffman, Emilie Bouchard, Rajnish Sharma, Adrin Ortiz, Michal Bonin, Ellen Avard, Audrey Simon, Patrick Leighton, Emily Jenkins

Summary

This is a multi-author conference abstracts collection from the 2021 ArcticNet Annual Scientific Meeting, covering diverse topics in Arctic ocean science including glaciology, oceanography, and ecology. Individual abstracts address topics such as tidewater glaciers and fjord oceanography in the Canadian High Arctic.

Study Type Environmental

There has been a recent focus on Greenlandic fjord oceanography as half of this island's contribution to sea level rise comes from submarine melting and ice discharge at tidewater glaciers. However, in the Canadian High Arctic, the role of fjords is not well understood, in part because of the lack of oceanic measurements. Two main oceanographic processes occur at the termini of tidewater glaciers during summer. The release of water produced by glacial meltwater runoff that finds its way to the bottom of the glacier is known as subglacial discharge, whereas submarine melting is the direct melting of the glacier by the ocean water. Quantifying subglacial discharge and submarine melting is critical to understanding fjord oceanography and cryospheric change in the catchment. This is typically done by comparing a temperatureconductivity-depth (CTD) profile close to the glacier with one that represents ambient oceanographic conditions farther offshore. Here, we develop a technique to depth-correct the ambient profiles to account for buoyancy difference following mixing with meltwater. Our results show that the standard method for comparing to ambient profiles may underestimate the amount of meltwater by up to 30%. We subsequently use eight years of water profiles taken in Milne Fiord, Nunavut (80.6N, 82.5W) to demonstrate the technique and investigate subglacial discharge and submarine melting in this fjord. The results show that both the amount of subglacial discharge and submarine melting meltwater are correlated to the amount of positive degree days (PDD).

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper